What does the US expect from Arabs in terms of its war against terrorism while using Veto against any resolution that condemns the Israeli military offensive against Palestinians?
2006-11-11 18:58:03 · 11 answers · asked by NsmV 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
yea, your right--...unfortunately everyone in America is either brainwashed by the media (which is owned by jewish people), or playing xbox. If you want justice, your going to have to seek it on your own. The USA is a giant machine. You will not change its policy and if you try to use force, you will only get more force from it.
so I suggest alibaba terrorists stop, yet moderate muslims try to convince (through means like media and statistics), that the palestinians also have their side of the story. I am just looking at it from the point of the american people..its not in the interests of america to keep supporting Israel in this biased manner. The whole world looks at it as unfair and hypocritical, but again, the USA is a lobby machine. Its a robot and the only way to change its policy, is to show the mechanic that services the robot, that the robot has a flaw in its programming. If you try to battle ther robot, the robot will initiate program and crush you...if you try to agree with the robot, it will just continue its programming.
2006-11-11 19:05:09 · answer #1 · answered by jack d 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
To Achieve peace the US needs to be the Honest broker, not the biased towards Israel it's now. Most of the grief Arabs have against the US is the result from the way the US is supporting Israel.
The Arabs have been begging Israel for peace, they even had the peace initiative which Israel never addressed. I think the Arabs have come the long way of realizing that Israel is there to stay (things said are mere rhetoric), now it's the turn of Israel to realize that they need to mend fences with the Arabs and that force won't break the will of the Palestinians from having their state.
Also please refer to the following statement to see how early Israeli leaders were looking at the situation.
According to Benny Morris, the leader of the Yishuv (and later first prime minister of Israel) David Ben-Gurion was an ardent supporter of population transfer (the removal of Arabs):
From April 1948, Ben-Gurion is projecting a message of transfer. There is no explicit order of his in writing, there is no orderly comprehensive policy, but there is an atmosphere of [population] transfer. The transfer idea is in the air. The entire leadership understands that this is the idea. The officer corps understands what is required of them. Under Ben-Gurion, a consensus of transfer is created.
He understood that there could be no Jewish state with a large and hostile Arab minority in its midst. There would be no such state. It would not be able to exist. [...] If he had not done what he did, a state would not have come into being. [...] Without the uprooting of the Palestinians, a Jewish state would not have arisen here.
Hope this helps
2006-11-12 05:01:37 · answer #2 · answered by Louay 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope, learn some history, they have been conquers in view that c. six hundred. Byzantine-Arab Wars: 634-750 Conquest of Persia: 633-651 Conquest of Transoxiana: 662-709 Conquest of Sindh: 664-712 Conquest of Hispania: 711-718 Conquest of the Caucasus: 711-750 Conquest of Nubia: seven hundred-1606 Conquest of Anatolia: 1060-1360 Byzantine-Ottoman Wars: 1299-1453 Conquests of Sub-Saharan Africa: 1200-1800
2016-10-17 04:27:09 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Terrorism in the Middle East is an expression of the fact that the Arabs refuse to accept the presence of a Jewish State in their region. Their efforts are directed at destroying Israel.
In Israel itself, Knesset members from the National Union-National Religious Party faction have been invited by Jewish residents of Jaffa, adjacent to Tel Aviv, to visit the city on Sunday to see the extent of the harassment and attacks on them by their Arab neighbors. Among the phenomena reported by the concerned citizens are physical and verbal violence, repeated property damage, harassment of Jewish women and girls, anti-Jewish slogans and Nazi swastikas featuring in graffiti, as well as extensive illegal construction in the Arab sector. The MKs have been asked to assist in combating the anti-Jewish trend.
2006-11-12 00:30:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. It is the results of the descendants of Ishmael (Arabs ),jealously toward Gods blessings on Israel and America.
God has cursed the descendants of Ishmael to wonder in the dessert like a wild donkey, forever. They want the Jews homeland as their own, especially Jerusalem. Never Happen
2006-11-12 14:33:16 · answer #5 · answered by Gary M 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Terrorism in the middle east is a result of the policy of most Arab governments and the Palestinians themselves to oppose and damage any peace process with Israel. and since these countries have the political backing of many countries in the world, but little military ability to act openly against Israel, they choose the policy of Terror actions and political propaganda against the US.
2006-11-11 20:33:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
yes.
in fact most all forms of crime and violence are a response to an unjust imposition of power.
so,
hopefully justice will prevail
2006-11-11 19:31:34 · answer #7 · answered by markisme 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Once the hive is disturbed it really is academic .....yet I question your assertion and it does take two to tango nonetheless
2006-11-11 19:45:27 · answer #8 · answered by dogpatch USA 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you and I see this very clearly, problem is the rest of america doesn't
2006-11-12 14:21:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, it is an action to a reaction
2006-11-12 18:32:13 · answer #10 · answered by thevillageidiotxxxx 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋