the latest example of his failure is : Rumsfeld who finally had to quit!
2006-11-11 17:02:14 · 12 answers · asked by the_ron 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
People in love will follow someone even if ordered to jump out of a plane without a parachute. Love is blind.
Sometimes people in love don't see the truth nor evil for what it is.
Even when over 2,800 of our own people are sent to their deaths for nothing.
2006-11-11 17:07:02 · answer #1 · answered by Nancy 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Uh, because Kerry is a dolt? The Dems didn't have a good candidate. He got bad advice on how to run his campaign. "Play the Viet Nam card". "Play the W is wrong card". The Dems didn't have a plan then and they don't have one now. I'd be first Republican to say Iraq was a mistake. But if the Senate would've let W's dad finish the job back during Desert Storm, we wouldn't have this problem now. Bush should've "stayed the course" and flushed out Osama, then worried about Saddam ignoring UN sanctions. Which he did. Technically we had a motive to unseat Saddam, but he was not a threat to us at the time...just to his own people.
But we are over there, and the Dems still want to fight with the GOP instead of offering ideas. All they want to do is criticize and offer nothing on the table except 'pull out'.
And Bush got the count in both 2000 and 2004. Quit griping about vote counts. Everytime they counted in Florida, Bush won. New Mexico was that close in Dems favor in 2000, but you didn't see the Republicans crying "foul". I could go on with this for a while, but trying to make a biased Dem/Lib understand reasoning is like trying to teach a carp to ride a motorcycle.
2006-11-12 01:28:39 · answer #2 · answered by unclewill67 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Evidently the Bush's admn. hasn't been a complete failure. We haven't been attacked
by terrorists since 9/11 even when the liberal/demo's try so hard to undermine everything being done. If you didn't have such a blinding hatred for him you would see just how much he has accomplished but you don't want to see it. Waste of breath. Your party is in now and we'll see just how much better you can do without so much a plan and only Bill Clinton to guide you!
2006-11-12 01:19:08 · answer #3 · answered by Brianne 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
As long as freedom remains in the U.S. there will be Dan Rathers labeling every American success a failure, turning every successful Battle of Baghdad into a Viet Nam. As you say, apparently some happy, productive, thankful and compassionate people still take time to vote.
2006-11-12 08:49:53 · answer #4 · answered by shirleykins 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
This wasn't a presidential election. We don't vote for a new president until 2008. As for the last election, he lost the popular vote, but won the electoral college. If you want to make a real change, lobby your congressmen to have direct vote.
2006-11-12 01:06:51 · answer #5 · answered by nursesr4evr 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I enjoy history as much as anyone, but Democrats take the cake. Will you ever stop living in the past? There is nothing that can come of complaining about what happened. Your party has the power now, what are you going to do with it?
2006-11-12 01:08:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
i think your a bit biased on President Bush and the republicans
2006-11-12 01:04:15 · answer #7 · answered by lyra 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I have one word for you: Diebold
2006-11-12 01:19:24 · answer #8 · answered by M&M_89 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
the big lie. It has worked quite well for many, and this is not going to be the last time it is used.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Lie
2006-11-12 01:04:28 · answer #9 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Because people trusted him and the republican part to be able todo right by them. When Katrina hit we saw how it really was.
2006-11-12 01:09:15 · answer #10 · answered by copestir 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋