English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

The question for democrats will be just how much scandal can they expose before they will paralyze the operation of the country. So much needs to see the light of scrutiny they could go on for years holding hearings. Could we stand it? Do we want to know? It could be good for us to see what has been happening these last six years, but I'm not sure we won't shoot the messenger before too long. I'm sure the new leadership in Washington is pondering this heavily.

2006-11-11 15:37:03 · answer #1 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 0 0

Are the Dems that strong? I don't think so. I hope we go on ridding this world of terrorists in Iraq and anywhere else they are to protect you, even if you don't care.

2006-11-11 23:38:39 · answer #2 · answered by dakota29575 4 · 0 0

You mean his corporate buddies bleeding the U.S. Treasury dry?

Remember it was the First Bush who funded Bin Laden Construction through the Saudi family when the (now) King Faisal Airbase was built by them.

2006-11-11 23:34:03 · answer #3 · answered by Gaspode 7 · 0 1

Yeah - you can blame anyone you want.

Don't forget, though, that the Islamic terrorists might have played a small part in it, too.

2006-11-11 23:32:21 · answer #4 · answered by LeAnne 7 · 1 0

NO BUT YOU CAN BLAME THE UN. ! AND THE 98 SENATORS AND ONLY 66 FROM THE HOUSE WHO DIDN'T VOTE FOR IT!

2006-11-11 23:31:37 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers