George Bush and law on guns in the USA?

Question

Don't you think its wrong that George Bush avades Iraq and yet guns are legalized in his own country, Causing the most school shootings then any other country - Can't he see that this is why so many kids are killed each year? And yet - Why do so many people still vote for him? Please explain because I really do not see why this moron is in power. As do Tony blair - He is following George's footsteps (creep!)

Yes people kill people with the guns that are legalized - If they wasnt legal there wouldnt be so many shootings, works like the drugs if drugs were legal there would be more deaths per year - Guns are designed for one thing only- DEATH

If guns were illegal there would be LESS school shootings and innocent victims, You can't say that there wouldn't be. Why not just have the tazer guns for self defence? Atleast that way no one gets killed and criminals would do their time in jail, which is what is deserved not death - Thats easy.

Thats a good point about crime rates increasing if they did make guns illegal to own - Very good point. But atleast make it safer and secure to buy one, Here in engand you have to go on a police background check, Wait weeks for doing a gun course and stuff like that, There must be less then 200 shootings here a year, but compared to america must well exceed that amount.

Answer 1

Quote: "Why do so many people still vote for him?"

Well, Americans are like a flock of sheep, they all do what the other does.
They are just as dumb as well, because they still stick with this Potus even though they can see that he is fecking up their own and other countries as well.
Plus they make all their decisions by television, if they see something or someone on the tele who says they will do something, they'll vote for him without even checking him out.
Like Bush jr.
In my opinion they only voted him Potus just for the fact that he's a Bush.
They never even thought about what troubles he can start.
Like these wars, Bush only started these because his daddy did that as well and he just had to show everybody that he can do it better than his old man.
Well, take a good look again jr, you failed big time!
As for the freedom to have a gun, the biggest mistake they've ever made.

Note: THIS IS ALL MY OWN OPINION.
Don't burn me off for saying, please.

Answer 2

i imagine people ought to look at extremely who replaced into the authentic people to blame. As a resident of Louisiana, I said that the typhoon's course replaced into headed good to New Orleans on Wednesday. If I said it, i recognize the Governor and the Mayor of latest Orleans(said it) and must have ordered people on that day to practice to evacuate. they did not attempt this until eventually Saturday and Sunday, Katrina hit on early Monday. As head officials of those parts, they'd the duty to help those people in getting out. some people were waiting to, others had no funds, others were being problematical-headed and by no potential leaving. those that had no funds could were provided the 100's of buses that were ultimately flooded because they sat parked. The reaction replaced into sluggish because Governor Blanco did not request the help of the President immediately away. She did not recognize what she replaced into doing. The levees were outfitted contained in the 1970's. A three hundred and sixty 5 days or so previous to Katrina, New Orleans had a ridicule typhoon performed, and they failed. They weren't even prepared for a ridicule. The governor and mayor knew about that, yet did not practice. there replaced into also funds that FEMA despatched to New Orleans for the duration of a typhoon season previous( for minor suggestions) it really is punctiliously unaccounted for. no human being can account for the position it went. If people purely might want to make sure the reality, it can make the information coverage of Katrina look like a sketch.

Answer 3

Well, since it is Congress and the state legislatures that pass the laws, you can't hold Bush directly accountable.

I would direct you to read the various books by John Lott, who has studied gun control and violence. He looks at various countries and states and compares their rate of violence with guns and without guns. He also goes into statistical bias used in reporting crimes...For example, if you have an unloaded gun in your pocket and beat someone to death with a baseball bat, it is still considered gun-related violence. Even if you hate guns, I would suggest you read it to learn some real facts and see the problems in attempting to study gun-related crimes.

You make assumptions about the crime rate without actually knowing it, spell incorrectly, and then call President Bush the moron? Good job.

Answer 4

George Bush is wronge, he probably can see all his people being killed but making guns illegal in america would be very hard. His popularity would shoot down crime rate would rise, due to there being a new crime (having guns) and george bush is out of the white house. Plus he'll probably go next election anyway looking at the latest elections.

Answer 5

Well, firearms are legal in the US and we did attack Sadam's Iraq and threw him out... I'm not seeing the connection there...

Anyway, the vast, vast, vast majority of firearms owners are lawful citizens not breaking into schools and shooting them up. And the vast, vast, vast majority of people who do break the law with firearms have them illegally, not legally.

You see, the gang bangers and criminals have illegally acquired firearms. They didn't go into the local store and buy them, they were stolen or smuggled.

Those who have firearms legally have purchased or acquired them legally. And these are not the people who are shooting up the schools.

You may be curious as to why we, in the United States recognize the right to have firearms. Or you may be just out to find a connection to bash a President over something (anything) for some emotional reason. But there is simply no connection.

Answer 6

If you hate guns so much, move to England. There only the people who should have guns have them, the criminals. Utah has a solution to that problem, they are putting some of the teachers through concealed carry classes and will allow the teachers to be armed in the schools. It is actually not illegal for adults to carry inside schools and churches in Utah.

Answer 7

Guns don't kill people - and making them illegal won't stop criminals from using them. Think about it. Would a drug dealer really care if he was breaking the law by carrying a gun? No. Guns are also made for protection and they are a right guaranteed in the Constitution.

Answer 8

As hostile as the bush administration is ,I definitely do not want to give up my gun rights.The gun control issue is an issue I'm going to side w/the cons on.I hate the fact that people are being murdered all over this world,It is a fact, and I'm not going to one of those people ,when ever it gets to the point that King George announces that every American who doesn't support the phony war on terrorism,is a terrorist themselves.(witch many cons all ready agree with).I'm not going to stand empty handed.You come kick in my door in & your gonig to lose your head.& tony blair reminds me of a lost puppy dog for some reason.

Answer 9

George Bush didn't create the constitution and bill of rights. George Bush upholds these documents and the freedoms all Americans have been given. Just as each and every president from George Washington has.

Ohh, that it, a conspiracy, the first presidents name was George and so is Bushes. Why didn't I see it before. They are in it together, out to destroy America and their allies.

Thanks for the insight. Now get me my duct tape, my head is hurting again.

Hey dumdum, good name for you. Bush did not take the guns, the mayor and chief of police authorized it.

Answer 10

See, if I take away the guns, then little Johny can still get beaten to death by a baseball bat. Besides, what would Dick play with?