2006-11-11 15:24:28 · 18 answers · asked by gwbsbodygaurd 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Yes, he is for something only if it benefits him which shows how spineless and shallow he is. Only an opportunist. I do feel though that bush has not been criticized enough for his wiretaps, etc.
I also feel replacing the word censured with criticized would have
expressed what you meant by the question. I have to give Credit to Bill for serving 8 years. Though his lies were blatant and terrible, I CENSURE the American public for reelecting him for the second term. Al Gore's reputation was destroyed simply by the president he served and not acts he committed himself.
2006-11-11 15:25:59 · answer #1 · answered by Professor Sheed 6 · 0⤊ 5⤋
When was he censured? Andrew Johnson was the only President to be censured, but that was later expunged. Democrats recommended censuring Clinton instead of impeachment, but he was impeached instead.
2006-11-11 23:08:13 · answer #2 · answered by Mutt 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bill Clinton was "censured," meaning blamed. He was censured by Congress.
I think you are confusing the word "censured" with another word.
Censored (with an O) means to suppress speech, or black out.
Do you feel a little stupid now?
That's what you get for Clinton bashing. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha,
2006-11-11 15:32:07 · answer #3 · answered by Yinzer from Sixburgh 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
I love Bill Clinton. We had 8 years of peace and prosperity under his tenure. When has he tried to supress free speech? You must be thinking of the sitting president, who thinks everyone who disagrees with him is a traitor, who thinks any detainee does not deserve a fair trial or representation, instead be waterboarded, and thinks he should monitor everyone's phone calls. You have the wrong man!!!!! W is trying to suppress the constitution.
2006-11-11 15:30:57 · answer #4 · answered by quickspend 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
i could think of each and every guy or woman who's misrepresented could a minimum of decide to verify what's being mentioned approximately them. i don't think of he's making an attempt to censor. of course, ABC DID deliver the preview to hurry Limbaugh of all of us-- why ought to HE get to verify it previously somebody who's represented in the docudrama. only like the coach you're making stuff up and distorting information. Did you not comprehend that he issued an govt order to assisinate UBL? not even Bush has carried out that much less even come close. a minimum of we got here on the edge of having him decrease than bubba. Calling off the assaults on him have been the doing of the militia and intelligence businesses for worry of collateral harm. You people would desire to pass on with your pathetic lives. Bubba has been out of place of work for over 6 years.
2016-10-21 22:44:51 · answer #5 · answered by grewe 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What?! Where have you been during the Bush Administration? Under a rock? He has taken away more rights from people than anyone! They had Cindy Sheehan (the mother of a fallen soldier) ARRESTED for wearing a friggin' t-shirt with the TRUTH written on it! Bush wants to legalize TORTURE! Bush's administration wiretaps phones! He wants to take away a woman's right to choose and wants to take away hope from millions of people by limiting stem cell research! I wish Bill Clinton could be president again so we could be rid of power crazy Bush and his Theocratic government. I am tired of him and his administration trying to shove their evangelical christian ideals down my throat!!
2006-11-11 15:40:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I've not heard the news yet tonight, Has something happened that caused B. Clinton to be censured?
What is he trying to surpress?
2006-11-11 15:27:44 · answer #7 · answered by Nort 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
He supressed free speech and freedom of the press when he threatened ABC over the truthful mini-series about the "Path to 9-11" Why should he not do the same again. Clintons only care about Clinton's and they will do anything to keep themselves in power.
2006-11-11 15:27:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Did you bring enough of the drugs for everyone on here????
What are you speaking of now? And I would think that a FORMER president trying to violate a constitutional right of another is less of a "bad" than the CURRENT president do the same thing. . .
2006-11-11 15:36:49 · answer #9 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
MonkeyBoy Bush has done more to destroy free speech than Clinton ever will. Illegal wiretaps, prisoner torture, suspension of Habeus Corpus, violation of the Geneva conventions and lying to start an immoral and illegal war. What a pig.
2006-11-11 15:30:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋