2006-11-11 14:59:40 · 3 answers · asked by thereddevil_mania 1 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Chemistry
I would guess that if you took a UV spectrum of ascorbic acid, you would find the maximum absorbance at 254 nm. Therefore, the most accurate analysis of the eluent would be looking at that wavelength.
2006-11-11 17:23:45 · answer #1 · answered by jellybeanchick 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So called "evidences for Darwin" often contain counsel loss, function loss, or function loss. Q "How do creationists clarify some mammals' lack of ability to synthesise ascorbic acid?" A. A function loss, it extremely is info we are degenerating. Mammals had the skill and lost it, possibly by a genetic replica mistake interior the regulatory component of the DNA code, so even nevertheless the mammals have the gene, the swap is often set to off. "Evolution explains it completely." extremely? Then provide us the reason. "in actuality, it is impossible for it to no longer have occurred by evolution." Having given an determination clarification above, then its no longer impossible.
2016-12-14 05:39:14 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because only 254nm can properly determine the content of asc.a. in HPLC. Duh. It's like asking "why do we box our shadows?" Obviously, they cannot hit back. It's obvious.
2006-11-11 15:13:31 · answer #3 · answered by What is a man 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋