English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-11 13:18:06 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

No, they should not hold impeachment trials against bush, however, they should let him know they will keep that on the table IN CASE he tries to veto everything Congress tries to pass.

2006-11-11 13:25:39 · answer #1 · answered by linus_van_pelt68 4 · 0 1

whilst the Democrats take over Congress this November, Impeachment heavily isn't mandatory. they are going to then be greater waiting to provide up his loopy rules, previously he does from now on long-lasting; unfavorable judgements. Impeachment does not unavoidably advise Bush could be removed from his duties. Impeachment alongside with very strict financial sanctions makes so lots greater experience, on the political scene, to maintain a Republican from triumphing the Presidency in '08. lots as I loath the belief of Bush remaining for an entire 2 years greater, I ought to admit it could be politically smarter to maintain him in there, with the prerequisites stated above.

2016-10-21 22:36:31 · answer #2 · answered by genthner 4 · 0 0

Likely.

2006-11-11 13:35:07 · answer #3 · answered by Saint 3 · 0 0

If Congress wants to screw over the American citizens

2006-11-11 13:23:21 · answer #4 · answered by monkeyguy1890 2 · 1 0

Only if they want to humiliate America before the terrorists and waste their time, because Bush has committed no crimes, while the terrorists plan to kill us

2006-11-11 13:20:48 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

no they a ve nothing really to hold against him, they will probably sit n their chairs and smirk for a while because they have the house and the senate

2006-11-11 13:25:24 · answer #6 · answered by lyra 3 · 0 0

only if clear evidence is provided that bush knew
of one or both

that iraq had no wmd

or he knew in advance of v. plames outting

2006-11-11 13:23:55 · answer #7 · answered by cork 7 · 1 0

For what reasonable reasons would they impeach him?

2006-11-11 13:23:15 · answer #8 · answered by Marcia M 2 · 2 0

What Alex said.

2006-11-11 13:54:15 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

I only hope so because it will keep them busy so as to not have time to screw up everthing else.

2006-11-11 13:26:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers