English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This mini Hitler should have been taken out during the first gulf war

2006-11-11 12:41:28 · 9 answers · asked by AL IS ON VACATION AND HAS NO PIC 5 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

9 answers

Because the same mess we're in now would have started 15 years earlier.

2006-11-11 12:51:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

For awhile our leaders were wise enough to realize to invade and over throw Saddam Hussein would open Pandoras box. Nobody wanted to create a situation where so many would die, that was taken into consideration in planning the gulf war, and majority of Americans support avoiding loss of life.

2006-11-11 20:53:56 · answer #2 · answered by longroad 5 · 1 0

I know. We defeated his army, liberated Kuwait, and left. We won in a sense, but in a way, we didn't. We achieved our main goals, like liberating Kuwait. If we took out Saddam then, we wouldn't have lost all of those lives in the most recent Iraq War and 50 civilians wouldn't be executed each day by barbaric terrorists.

2006-11-11 21:01:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Is that the way you want the world to be run? Do you want any country to go to another country and "take out" their leader if they feel they are "bad". There are several countries that think that way about Bush. Do you want some other country attacking the U.S. to "take out" our President????? We should help when asked only.

2006-11-11 21:04:22 · answer #4 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 0 0

none of America's business, you are not the worlds cops
back off sit down and shut up

you are incompetent look at the mess you made in Iraq
another Vietnam
BTW what is todays body count?

2006-11-11 20:43:30 · answer #5 · answered by mohamed jihad dirka dirka 2 · 2 0

because the elder Bush didn't want this to happen... what's happening now...

it's a religious powder keg... people who have hated each other for thousands of years over religion...

it's a very hard situation to control...

2006-11-11 20:49:55 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Because after we bombed the crap out of the retreating Iraqi army, liberals started whining about unnecessary killing.

2006-11-11 20:46:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

we?

we?

who gave us authority to rid the world of people??

bush is indeed a far worse scourge on the human race..
can "we" rid ourself of him?

2006-11-11 20:57:46 · answer #8 · answered by cork 7 · 1 0

i agree, but i think the US gvt wanted the iraquis to give him a trial so they cant turn on us and say we killed him. but i dont see why this would make them angry...

2006-11-11 20:43:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers