When countries like China and India also have to follow the accords, then we should consider it.
2006-11-11 11:34:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
not one of the above, he merely stated that he would not make usa aside of it until it created a point enjoying field for all countries, which I do accept as true with even with the undeniable fact that the clock is ticking for the international to gets its act mutually and that i don't think of that the human international will end earlier the time is up.
2016-11-23 16:15:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nothing. And rosbif knows nothing. Look at China. They are the biggest polluters.
2006-11-12 13:47:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He withdrew from it.The US is the worlds largest polluter and as most of that pollution comes is related to the oil business,GWB didn't want to upset his friends.
2006-11-11 11:39:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by rosbif 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Hopefully nothing. There is nothing in there to protect our earth, only further limit capitalism and ruin the west's economies. It is a liberal scam
2006-11-11 11:32:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
None..he lets industry use "voluntary" efforts to curb emission of green house gases...the #1 culprit behind fossil fuel.
2006-11-11 11:30:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by dstr 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
None... we are not signators of that treaty.... Thank God for that!
2006-11-11 11:39:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
NOTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-11-11 11:36:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by Vagabond5879 7
·
0⤊
1⤋