holding one self out to the husband or wife of the person with whom one is cohabitating is not necesary to constitute.
im studying law.but cant get the true meaning of this.
2006-11-11 09:42:47 · 3 answers · asked by super girl 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
it has to do with penal code 273.5 on injury to a spouse
2006-11-11 10:10:48 · update #1
I think you missed out a word... holding oneself out to BE the.......
It would be my understanding that they are saying "You do not have to be married to someone to be classed as co-habiting"
In th family code it then gors on to say that you need not be of the opposite sex either - which to my mind is basically further suggesting that the bit you are unsure of is simply saying "you don't need to be married to be classed as cohabiting"
Horrible wording I grant you.
2006-11-11 09:52:55 · answer #1 · answered by Mark T 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Do not cause harm and suffering to others or may constitute individually ,and significant immorality
2006-11-11 18:04:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
That doesn't sound like a complete sentence to me. Did you miss something?
2006-11-11 17:52:10 · answer #3 · answered by Ms. G. 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋