Considering that Saddam was responsible for the unwarranted deaths of perhaps 10,000 Iraqis, tops... while Bush was responsible for the unwarranted deaths of at least ten times that number of them. Then... isn't it a shame that IF Bush could be convicted and sentenced to death -- that there's no way that he could be executed 10 times? That would be only fitting, after all.
And... failing any of that, then the next-best thing would be to simply turn Saddam loose with our apologies and reinstate him as President of Iraq. He then could do that which we've been ABYSMAL at: reunify that country and re-stabilize it. Meanwhile, his people would idolize him! (Too bad it had to cost anywhere between 100,000 and 600,000 innocent Iraqi lives (and those of around 3,000 of our troops) for us to get to this point.)
2006-11-11 08:30:43 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Graig C, I don't believe that Saddam is going to be executed. His next trials will drag on for 2 more years until next president will forgive him. Bush only hyped Saddam's execution before the election for political purposes. Bush can't be charged for mass murdering innocent people and thousands of our troops because of the patriotic act he signed. That was indeed shrewed of the neoconservatives. Yes, Saddam was a bad dictator and perhaps deserves to be killed, but he was not the worst dictator. Why is Bush picking on Saddam? USA built him up and made him bad. Rumsfeldt dealt with Saddam and supported him in the past. USA saved Saddam's butt in the past from many assassinations designed by his Shiites rebels. They gave him all the weapons and chemicals to defend himself from those Shiites rebels. Now because Saddam refused to cooperate with the USA like Qaddafi did and because we need Saddam's oil, so he is no good? What about Sudan's President Al-Bashir, who is killing innocent people left and right in Darfur? What about Libya's president, Qaddafi the horrible dictator? What about Egypt's president, Mr. Mubarak, the selfish bad dictator? What about Syria's President, Mr. Al-Assad, who is killing and jailing his opponents every day? What about Saudi Arabia King and his Sheiks, who hate Christians and oppressing outsiders (not Saudis)? Should we invade their countries and execute those dictators as well? C'mon Republicans, Is this logical? It is fine if you want to bully people around and control the oil resources in the world, but this is not the way to do it. Brutal Military Action as we are experiencing, destroying other countries and killing innocent civilians does not match our Great American Values and Morals. I am really ashamed of our president Bush and his bad ethics. God Bless the USA and our troops forever.
2006-11-11 11:23:50 · answer #1 · answered by Mr. J 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Ummm...not to be too technical here, but....I think it highly unlikely that "we" would bring such charges against the President of our own country. So far as what OTHER countries want to do, well, that is entirely up to them.
So far as turning Saddam loose? Brilliant!! I am a very strong advocate for that idea. By all means, turn him loose - in a large arena filled with the survivors of his murderous regime. Did Saddam keep down the insurgency? Yup, he sure did, all the while he was directly responsible for the genocide of his own people. IT IS WHAT HE IS BEING PUT TO DEATH FOR.
I think maybe some people need to get off their soapbox built of rhetoric and devote a little more time and energy to searching for sane solutions. Incidentally, I am NOT a Bush supporter (on ANY issue), but I am also not a supporter of the lunatic fringe.
2006-11-11 08:48:05 · answer #2 · answered by happy heathen 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
If you don't appreciate Bush then why don't you become the president, oh wait maybe no one would vote for you. And if you can't stand behind the troops, stand if front of them. Your to scared to go and lead a country or fight for your freedom cause your a woosie. By the way, I am not a republican, I am not a democrat, I am a liberal. And why don't you kill president clinton, because he cheated on his wife, and why don't you kill anyone who has ever commited any kind of crime, including littering. Everyone would be dead. Plus bush did not do what Saddam did. And Bush did not force the troops to go to Iraq they signed up. Why don't you go fight for our country, actually don't because you care nothing about America. And if you and others don't like bush then why is he president. Obviously people chose him. This is going to happen to our next president too. (that person won't be you)
2006-11-11 08:45:19 · answer #3 · answered by jg31 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
No. maximum of Congress gave the president the approval to apply stress in Iraq. another international locations have reported expenses however the U. S. did not connect the worldwide worldwide courtroom so there is not something legally binding approximately those expenses that the U. S. could turn Bush or his administration over to them for trial. maximum human beings of the contributors of congress who voted for the Iraq determination could could desire to instruct themselves over for trial besides. i don't see that occuring. question lady: no person is alive right this moment that owned slaves. How can we punish the lifeless human beings. people who're alive stopped slavery and handed the civil rights rules.
2016-10-17 03:47:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your question has been asked so many times why don't you just read the other answers and save yourself some points.
Or did you think this was an original...never before asked question!?
2006-11-11 13:58:59 · answer #5 · answered by iraq51 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Where have you been? The bulk of those Iraqi deaths were brought on by their own people! Ever heard of car bombs, roadside bombs, men on bicycles with bombs, men on motorcycles with bombs...killing their own kind to separate Sunnis from Shiites & destroy the people of Iraqs free will. I am against the war but are you an idiot?? Allow Saddam to regain power & apologise to him??Why don't you go live there? Your ignorant self wouldn't even be allowed to write the letter you wrote here!
2006-11-11 08:44:55 · answer #6 · answered by Edward J 3 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Are you deaf or just stupid less than 100k deaths from the insurgents, and our forces. Saddam killed hundreds of thousands upon thousands using gas, be-headings dismemberment,torture and put them into mass graves. Just park your car in the garage and leave it running. So we don't have to read any more of you crap.
2006-11-11 08:42:36 · answer #7 · answered by roger k 2 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Clinton should be charged with War Crimes for causing 9/11.
By the way, your figures have been proved false. Weeks ago.
2006-11-11 08:33:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
Sure, about the same time you are sentenced to brain death
2006-11-11 08:36:03 · answer #9 · answered by goodtimesgladly 5 · 3⤊ 3⤋
He tried to 'Kill My Daddy' and 'Bring It On'. He needs shafting for those two.
2006-11-11 08:42:06 · answer #10 · answered by l1011graham 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋