2006-11-11 08:01:41 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
I see it does set their hair on fire. (I rest my case)
I'm not gloating, it's just that everytime you ask a question about someone they don't like, instead of answering the question (or leaving it alone), the drag in an insult about Hillary or Kennedy. Just want them to know that people NY & MA love them.
2006-11-11 08:20:54 · update #1
Hillary - 67%, Spencer - 31%, Others - 2%
Kennedy - 69%, Chase - 31%
2006-11-11 08:30:06 · update #2
I am burning an internal rage that I can only control with alcohol. No, no! In an ironic twist, the alcohol that has soothed me all these years is now burning... burning... bu
2006-11-11 08:04:33 · answer #1 · answered by J G 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Actually it should scare the Democrats that they got so little. Look at where they are at more than 80% of the population of all northeast states are supposed to be Democrat so they should have done better. I guess Democrat is different than lunatic like Kennedy and Clinton. By the way you guys still planning on making Hillary your presidential nominee and garauntee the win for Republicans?
2006-11-11 08:25:03 · answer #2 · answered by Wilkow Conservative 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes it does.Look at them whine.Facts are the American people voted for change and the right wing trolls on this board are so far out of touch with reality,they're now even on the far right side of Bush at this moment.
They keep asking Q's pretending Democrats will not defend America,that terrorists are celebrating while even Bush himself said and i quote"The Democrats are gonna defend America,of course they will,just like the Republicans"
Somehow the people representing the right on this board don't seem to be the pick of the litter
2006-11-11 10:32:56 · answer #3 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Keep in mind that that was in the Northeast. They were expected to win.
Let's not gloat. We have hard work ahead if we are going to change this country's course. Let's show the Repubs that we are not the haters and devisive partisans that they are. We can work with them in a bipartisan manner and win the Presidency in '08.
How about a ticket like Edwards/Obama??
2006-11-11 08:15:24 · answer #4 · answered by notyou311 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I understand that Hillary spent an amount that used to be spent on a Presidential campaign, so she could claim a mandate.
Kennedy doesn't need to run. Massachusetts will elect a Golden Retriever if you tag the name 'Kennedy' on it.
2006-11-11 08:54:31 · answer #5 · answered by DAR 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Can't see why it would; their respective states are undeniably blue. Besides, when Hillary (yes, i do mean when) wins the nomination in 2008, more people will turn out to vote against her than voted for Reagan.
2006-11-11 08:08:34 · answer #6 · answered by spewing_originality 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Yes, especially since Hillary supports Bush in Iraq.
She considers other Democrats to be cowardly traitors.
2006-11-11 08:03:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Why would it? In my state, every office we have was won by a republican. That's good enough for me since I live nowhere near the two of them.
2006-11-11 08:06:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
People in NY love Hilary? Really? Are you sure about that? Get your facts straight lady, I was born and raised in NY and the only things I hear about Hilary are negative.
2006-11-11 08:23:53 · answer #9 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
is that why hillary moved from arkansas to the most liberal area in the country to guarantee an election in her favor?
as for teddy, how many cemeteries voted for him? I know how many time mary J kopechne voted.
2006-11-11 08:11:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋