English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

Of course it should be a democrat. And unless things change very dramatically over the next two years, it's a fair bet it WILL be a democrat.

People are finally starting to catch on that the Iraq war was a bad idea, and Bush screwed up by starting it. What I want to know is what took them so long. Everything that opponents of the war have been saying from the start turned out to be true. And most of it was obvious from the start to anyone who payed attention in 9th grade history.

And then there's the Foley scandal. Sexually harassing teenage boys doesn't go over too well with a constituent base that's big on family values. And having so Republican congressmen helping to cover it up makes the whole party look bad.

Of course, those are by no means the only Republican screw-ups, but they seemed to be the too biggest factors in Tuesday's Democratic victory. When it comes down to it, in one of the senate races (I think it was Rode Island), the Republican incumbent was voted out essentially just because he was a Republican, despite being one of the more liberal Republicans in congress and having been fairly popular in his home state. The Democrats took over the senate with just 1/3 of the seats up for reelection. The presidental election is still two years away, so things can change, but right now it's quite clear that America does not want another Republican.

2006-11-11 07:44:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4 4

in the event that they'd publish a possible candidate then specific. they basicly threw mitt romney in there through fact intense condenders for the presidentacy do no longer desire to run against a president runing for 2d term assume there to be extra useful techniques next time around. I propose did you seem on the republican applicants they have been all nut situations. doens't certainly remember the president does not carry the flexibility interior the U. S. it is held by potential of the corperations and the senent. the president has ability he only doesnt' have adequate to make it remember who's in place of work.

2016-12-10 07:13:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

In 2008 we will have had 8 years of the Village Idiot and the other Republicans. The fact that this country will have survived - if indeed it does - should signal that we're strong enough to survive even the most incompetent of fools. For that reason, if for no other, the Democrats should sweep to a victory in '08 and no matter how much the Republicans try to steal the election, it won't do them any good.

2006-11-11 08:37:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I'm not an american citizen so I will give the opinion of an outsider.
Having been a witness of what G. Bush and co. have done to the world this last years and having seen what american political society has become under teh government of tight republican ideas, I am convinced that the next President should deffinetely be a democrat.

2006-11-11 08:26:49 · answer #4 · answered by lotus 3 · 1 1

Democrat!

2006-11-11 07:49:29 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Jeb Bush 2008 Republican

2006-11-11 07:43:18 · answer #6 · answered by nbr660 6 · 2 5

It's not the party, It's the person. The next president will most likely be John McCain or Rudy Guiliani. I don't think Hillary Clinton can win.

2006-11-11 07:52:56 · answer #7 · answered by Michael 6 · 2 4

I want either one as long as he really wants the best interest of the citizens and not just his party in charge.

2006-11-11 07:57:21 · answer #8 · answered by firewomen 7 · 1 0

Maybe a third party would be good.

2006-11-11 13:51:40 · answer #9 · answered by lollylou 3 · 0 0

A democrat for SURE. Hillary would be a good choice

2006-11-11 07:45:23 · answer #10 · answered by JS 3 · 2 5

fedest.com, questions and answers