Listen you brain-dead, left-wing fruitcake:
He murdered 1,000,000 people in the wars HE started! He murdered ANOTHER 1,000,000 people in his death camps, secret police prisons, assasination squads, gas attacks of HIS OWN people, 100,000 Shi'ites buried alive, 50,000 little children tortured to death to punish their parents!
It is estimated by the UN and others that as many 2-3,000,000 children died as a direct result of him taking ALL food and medical imports and SELLING them for weapons!
George Bush went to war against this monster, removed him from power and YOU think that BUSH is the villain here?
(and I also suppose that you are one of those militant atheist-materialists who also believe that Mother Theresa was a terrible monster because she committed the unforgivable crime of "giving hope to the hopeless!")
2006-11-11 05:35:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Saddam was tried and convicted of several massacres of Shi'a and Kurd civilians after the Gulf war, roughly 10,000 civilians in all. He was indicted, charged, and convicted by an Iraqi court.
Bush is not the villian because he didn't order 10,000 Kurds and Shi'a slaughtered. Should Truman have been charged for the Rape of Nanking or the Holocaust?
2006-11-11 05:25:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Saddam is being hung for crimes committed 20 years ago before Bush was even in the picture. The stuff that's happened more recently doesn't even matter. Plus if they don't kill him he has already threatened to kill every person who played part in his trial.
They should put it on TV.
2006-11-11 05:24:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
How do you not support it? He committed genocide and killed thousands of people in his own country and then just dumped them in mass graves like animals. He was attempting to "cleanse" his country to his liking, much like Hitler. He isn't the only one - how about that upstanding leader in Darfur? There's a real dilly for you... I'm not much for capital punishment since DNA testing has set free more than a couple people on death row who were proved innocent. But in a case like Saddam? Who needs DNA, the whole world knows who was running that show. I say hang him on public TV.
2006-11-11 05:28:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Hello?!?!?! GENOCIDE!! He killed so many of his own people! He violated the Geneva Convention.
Although Bush has his own issues, Saddam being hung is a totally different one.
2006-11-11 05:25:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by lovebluenfluff 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
He murdered a entire village of people including children. Now he shall hang.The iraq judge set the sentence.The number in this single murder was over 140 people
2006-11-11 05:23:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Billy T 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes once again the yanks prove how naieve and stupid they are.
Let me spell it out.
You, America, invaded a foreign sovreign nation (one ruled by a total b*stard who was incidentally being funded and supported by America when he was gassing villages of Kurds) illegally and now your puppet law courts there have decided to hang Saddam ie. you have done this ie invaded and murdered the ruler.
Of course Saddam deserves to die, but by the same measure so does Bush who has caused the deaths of thousands (including kids) and thrown the whole world into turmoil so he can steal oil.
Why do I bother? You simpletons are not capable of understanding until they put it on CNN.
2006-11-11 07:04:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by airmonkey1001 4
·
0⤊
4⤋
Didn't Saddam kill many of his own people and the Kurds? Didn't he invade Kuwait?
2006-11-11 05:21:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by "I Want to Know Your Answer 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
husein is getting put to death because the people that are running things in iraq were put into power by the amerikkkans. so obviously they are going to have a biased agenda. do u think the amerikkkans would have actually put someone in power that was objective? everyone knows the amerikkkans rigged their elections.
2006-11-11 05:31:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
Cowboys with white hats are never the villian. (tongue in cheek)
2006-11-11 05:24:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by gare 5
·
1⤊
1⤋