Forunately we live in a nation where we don't have to pick either/or. . .we can have both. Hillary for President, Barrack for Vice President or Barrack for President & Hillary for VP. It would be nice to have a female president though.
2006-11-11 05:33:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by kobacker59 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
They are both very well qualified I have no problem voting for either. I think Obama would be more of a unifying presence in the White House than Hillary though.
2006-11-11 08:31:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I AM not sure if Barack is real or just another decoy.. but I do know Hillary and Bush both work for the NWO, Israel and the Vatican!
2006-11-11 05:51:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Mickey mouse write in vote with Barack as VP
2006-11-11 05:31:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by topgunpilot22 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Barack is gaining popularity.
Go Barack.
2006-11-11 05:17:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
like this is a choice? Give me a break. The Democrats will screw up the election and the Republicans will retain the White House. McCain in '08!
2006-11-11 06:09:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
they could debate on CNN if it got here right down to it. even though it is hypocritical and clearly the Clinton's attempt to tension MSNBC into going effortless on them. It is mindless that Clinton herself could merely flow on Fox information, a channel which peddles each grotesque rumor ever began on the topic of the Clintons (Dick Morris works there, and he's even accused her of being and anti-Semite) yet then threaten MSNBC over what replaced into needless to say an errors in judgment, yet replaced into no longer meant maliciously via Shuster, who's one in each of NBCs ultimate container newshounds. On top of that, i'm unsure i'm delicate with somebody who desires to be President, and is already a senator, attempting to tension the press into offering favorable coverage. And to flow extra, the be conscious "pimp" in all of its varieties, is used lots extra often and extra innocuously via the less than-30 set than it replaced into 10 years in the past and Shuster gave the look to be attempting (wrongly) in elementary terms to apply slang. you could think of the Clintons could understand that and enable the situation drop, yet i think of they're surely that disconnected, they're attempting to tension NBC, and that they are attempting to win sympathy help in spite of the reality that in the event that they do no longer enable it drop, they're those attempting to bully the press, no longer any incorrect way around.
2016-12-14 05:24:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Barrack...absolutely.
2006-11-11 05:21:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by kolacat17 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Barack. He is such a good speaker.
2006-11-11 05:18:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Emily D 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
hillary
2006-11-11 05:17:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by I think of you I touch Myself 2
·
0⤊
1⤋