Of course. Why else would the definition of beauty change over the centuries? At one time larger women were considered beautiful and most cultures differ in what they define as beautiful. Some believe long necks or small feet are signs of beauty
2006-11-11 05:06:39
·
answer #1
·
answered by chr1 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO, there have been checks performed with little ones who've by no potential study a way mag or considered a elegance pagent. They were shown pictures of "beautiful" people, "well-known" searching people and "gruesome" people (the rankings were judged by a panel of the final public). The little ones reactions were studied and they found that the little ones gave favorable reactions to the attractive people's pictures. even as many grimaced on the photographs of the gruesome people. additionally they got here upon that the further symetrical a persons' face replaced into the more effective the reaction. What this proves is that our brains, similar to that of different animals, has a outfitted in detector of elegance. area of our evolution i wager.
2016-11-29 00:58:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by cutburth 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Totally.
Men don't really want those skinny women that look like concert ration camp inmates: they really want women with curves. The media wants skinny. Who wins?: the media
2006-11-11 05:05:20
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
But media are also people of our time and they express it, another thing is we all have the same problem is too much of materialism.
2006-11-11 05:11:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by a flower 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
yes and no
if you let media influence you then definitely its a yes
but ignore it
then you have your own perception of beauty
Beauty comes from within then outwards
2006-11-11 05:09:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you've answered your own Q,,, Thank you for being so insightful...smiles
Steven Wolf
2006-11-11 05:02:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by DIY Doc 7
·
0⤊
0⤋