Is president bush the saviour of the west?

Question

Most people I meet are anti american and anti bush..but most of them are simpletons jumping on the trendiest bandwagon in town.
Before the invasion of iraq most of these people couldnt point to the middle east on a map.So the hunt for wmd was a little white lie that helped to grease the wheels for public support.so what.If bush was to tell you that your fat greedy arsed way of life was threatened by dwindling oil stocks or chinese influence in the middle east..your so distant from hardship at the moment that you wouldnt believe the threat and would have opposed something ultimately for your benefit.the truth is YOU CANT HANDLE THE TRUTH.Learn from your history, how neville chamberlain and his government ignored the warnings of churchill.Where early intervention could have saved millions of lives.Its so easy to take the moral highground sitting in ivory towers,why wait until the muslims or chinese have the whiphand , by then it will be too late!

Answer 1

IF BUSH LOSES, THE WORLD LOSES.
There may be millions of deaths during the next 10 years.
BUT DON'T WORRY. THE DEMOCRATS WILL "FEEL THEIR PAIN".

Answer 2

George Bush is the not the saviour of the west!!! Quite the contrary.
How dare you say that most people who are anti-bush are simpletons? Am I wrong in believing, that the states which voted him in as president for the second time, have a much lower average IQ than those who voted for an alternative party?
I work in an office of 14 people in the UK. Everybody has a minimum of a bachelors degree under their belt. They all think George Bush is 'the' major terror threat. It has nothing to do jumping on the band wagon - people are genuinely concerned and mystified, by how this man became responsible for such a powerful nation.
And your question on; why wait until the muslims or chinese have taken the whiphand?
Why do you think that the USA has the right to have it instead? Why should the USA go throwing their weight around in countries that have nothing to do with them? Can you imagine what would happen, if China decided to invade the USA, as they saw George Bush as a threat, with nuclear weapons (real ones)? Is that not the reason that Iraq was invaded?! Hypocrisy. Stop being so naive.

Answer 3

I think you may simplifying the situation, a little white lie, Not quite. Theta little white lie will cause problems and wars in the world for the next few generations.

Saddam was a problem and should have been removed a long time ago, but then in the same context lets look around the world a get rid of the rest of the religious fundamentalists and dictators, lets start with G W Bush himself.

Answer 4

NO!!!! He is a self serving idiot.
Early intervention? We better get some troops into North Korea then. Things are looking dangerous there.
Chinese! Did you notice the trade imbalance between the US and China. Guess who financed the Chinese government! We were to busy consuming cheap goods made by abused Chinese labourers to think about such uninteresting things like that. So, After the US kicks the Korea dictator with the funny hair out on his butt, lets keep the M-1s rolling to China!!!YEEHAAA!!!

Answer 5

the american people are no worse than anyone else this has nothing to do with bush ,by bush you mean the man and the inner sanctum the guys that knowone agrees with the people who all proffited from 9/11 and the iraq war,the freek shows that like to watch demonic rituals of burning a effigy of a child called the cremation of care infront of a 40ft stone owl while they dress in babylonian druidick robes down at the bohemian grove,the guy thats grandfather worked with the nazis a fuking traitor yet nothing happened to him,you mean bush the guy who started his first company with bin laden money . and it goes on and on WAKE UP bush is dismanteling the states watch this film be informed or dont bother and just go on about subjects you have no clue about and havent done any research in :http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=786048453686176230&q=terrorstorm

Answer 6

Bush is only the saviour of the West in his own head.

It hasn't benefitted Britain at all to get involved with his war (it got more than 50 Brits blown to pieces by Muslim extremists last year though and a load of our servicemen killed).

Chamberlain's "Appeasement" was supported by many Brits who had lived through the horror and slaughter of WWI and the loss of nearly an entire generation of young men on the battlefields of the Somme, and didn't want to go through it again 20 years later. They were desperate to avoid war at any cost. Chamberlain did the best he could but Hitler was a madman not to be reasoned with.

Answer 7

Oh boy, a movie buff. Um, Mr. Chamberlin was England's history, not ours, and we did finally learn from our mistakes, we gave the people who supported Bush's policies the boot last week. Have a nice day while you froth over our fat greedy arsed way of life. Just be happy America had the "lend lease" program. Oh, that's more history from us to you.

Answer 8

Those are not the most important issues... Yes we may be in need of a change, but not at the sake of losing innocent babies or allowing murderers to run free on the streets.

Answer 9

The only way bush could be a saviour is if one believed in murdering innocents with uncalled for wars and policies.

Answer 10

The West was fine as it bleedin well was, it was the decision to go a blow up some of the other side of the map that made people anti-bush. Its true that mistakes were made, but it was hitler who started that war, he was the one oppressing freedom