English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Yet the rest of the world is suffering terrorist attacks on their own soil and have been while we have not.Do you really think they have it right?

2006-11-11 04:25:24 · 16 answers · asked by Tommy G. 5 in Politics & Government Politics

16 answers

Well, this "flag waving moron" right here, thinks that if the dems get their way, we shall soon look like Spain and France. Crippled by terrorism.

Muslim at 20-25% of the world's religion right now. Why haven't we heard from them?

2006-11-11 04:39:00 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 2 0

After 9/11 we had the world behind us.

Going into Afghanistan. We had the world behind us. Why didn't we mobilize our military in the numbers like we did with Iraq? Why did we let the guy who actually caused 9/11 to escape because we were so distracted by Iraq that had nothing to do with it? Bush and his stupidity, that's why. The Dems won because enough Americans can see that now.

Going into Iraq. We lost most of the world's support because it was not justified. Iraq will haunt us for generations to come. It is breeding more terrorists than we could ever count. Bush's cowboy philosophy of trying to just go in and kick butt has left the world in a much worse position than before 9/11.

I'm all for being strong. But if we aren't smart too, we are doomed regardless of how strong we are.

2006-11-11 04:44:04 · answer #2 · answered by taotemu 3 · 1 0

The issue of global terrorism far outweighs the concept of a dual party in the U.S.

We should have a separate category in Yahoo just for terrorism, so we can try to address the fact that Islamic extremist want to kill us, regardless of our political affiliation.

Okay, so George W is a little primitive in his approach, but this will not be an excuse in a couple of years as the terrorist attacks continue.

2006-11-11 04:40:53 · answer #3 · answered by Action 4 · 0 0

that's because of the fact the yank government, under the management of GW Bush, has been extra unilateralist than interior the previous. This has produced an uncomfortable and strained set of international kin - and a few animus in direction of the U.S. GW Bush has made many tactical blunders. he's no longer very clever, and consequently grew to become into no longer waiting to appreciate the possibly results of his guidelines. He has no actual information of human rights, and is consequently harshly criticized by way of many intellectuals international, yet incredibly in Europe. different governments and peoples are happy related to the president's social gathering getting a rebuke final week interior the elections because of the fact they think of that's going to in all likelihood get extra effective now. this is incredibly, impossible now to worsen. the persons of different international places in all likelihood experience that in step with risk the yank human beings share a number of their perspectives - in step with risk evidenced by way of the election consequences.

2016-12-17 08:22:47 · answer #4 · answered by coupe 4 · 0 0

Well, I asked a question, using the UK's YA, feel free to read the answers. They had a lot to say about the Democrat's win.

2006-11-11 05:23:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

well, GW and his radical neoCON agenda has been pretty scary for the rest of the world. the Democratic win implies a softening of chicken hawk rhetoric and hopefully a more reasoned approach to the world's problems. the world is getting far too small for Yeehaw Shoot Em Up Cowboy mentalities.

2006-11-11 04:35:08 · answer #6 · answered by nebtet 6 · 1 3

I think the rest of the world is relieved that the march to fascism in the USA has at least been temporarily arrested. There are still memories of Hitler in the world. A Hitler with the world's largest nuclear arsenal is an unthinkable prospect.

2006-11-11 04:33:43 · answer #7 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 3 4

Good point, and we Americans know that democrats are very weak on terrorism and by wanting the militay cut back, we will face many attackes!!!!

2006-11-11 04:35:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

bush the bozo is a lame duck. he has alienated us from the rest of the world,of course they all are happy because they want an intelligent person leading the world not some cowboy.

2006-11-11 04:31:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 5

oh yes, they realize what bush was trying to do with iraq and him realizing it could never be taken he put us in a very bad situation.

2006-11-11 04:34:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers