Then the next week he said that he and Rumsfeld decided to change leadership. A lie? Or a 'flip flop'?
2006-11-11 03:40:31 · 18 answers · asked by hichefheidi 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I'm not a liberal! LMFAO! And no matter how much you insult, twist, or don't understand what I am talking about, doesn't make it an answer to this question. I guess the reps are really sore about the dems taking back control! And now I know why america VOTED them back in! But thatks, HEATHEN for being the one person who knows what I am talking about.
2006-11-11 04:00:08 · update #1
He lied. Are you surprised/shocked/amazed? He ADMITTED to lying about this topic during his morning press conference the other day, saying (in part) that telling the lie was basically the only way he thought he could get the media off his back.
Look up "narcissistic personality disorder". The rules, you see, simply don't apply to him. I think Merriam-Webster will be editing their dictionary. The entry for "arrogance" will read, "See George W. Bush".
2006-11-11 03:48:15 · answer #1 · answered by happy heathen 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
As he said when he announced Rummy would be staying, "I'm the Decider" and Rummy was staying. Guess after the election, he decided Rummy wasn't worth keeping around. And, you know there are going to be Congressional investigations into the conduct of the war now that the Democrats are thankfully in power and Rummy would be called upon to testify. Since he'd have to tell the truth, The Decider couldn't have that since he doesn't believe in telling the truth - so Rummy got shown the door.
2006-11-11 03:46:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
even with the undeniable fact that i in my opinion don't have faith lots of something the president says anymore, he did not fire 'feldy, he provide up. He would have been mendacity if he knew that Donald could resign. No, we won't be able to have faith something he says. No, i don't think of he has any shame yet, however the subsequent 2 years would carry shame to him.
2016-10-21 21:57:45 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Try again. Bush said he wanted Rumsfeld to stay on. It was a remark, not a command.
2006-11-11 03:43:20 · answer #4 · answered by Emm 6 · 4⤊ 2⤋
I don't think Rummy wanted the job any more the man is 70+ years old.
2006-11-11 03:48:57 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Rumsfield stated that when he felt he could no longer effectively serve as Secretary of State he would resign. After the election he felt that was the case and he cose to resign. End of story. get your facts straight.
2006-11-11 03:48:07 · answer #6 · answered by Greg 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
A matter of a change of opinion/mind... whats the big deal, its for the better of the Repubs...
2006-11-11 03:44:35 · answer #7 · answered by ~*LILY*~ 2 · 4⤊ 2⤋
The real explanation is that he was in the process, but couldn't just tell the press, "Hey I'm looking for a new SOD as we speak."
Isn't this what you wanted? He's changing course. So why are you hassling him?
2006-11-11 03:45:07 · answer #8 · answered by Uncle Pennybags 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Are you nuts?
Rumsfeld resigned.
2006-11-12 12:48:54 · answer #9 · answered by STUD MAGNET HEIDI 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No matter what the man does, you people whine.Liberals wanted Rummy gone for ages, when Bush finally does it you STILL whine!!
2006-11-11 03:42:04 · answer #10 · answered by BAARAAACK 5 · 4⤊ 4⤋