English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Would you be born without arms or born without legs?

2006-11-10 22:39:08 · 10 answers · asked by tanya 3 in Society & Culture Cultures & Groups Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender

10 answers

Legs, my hands are too usefull.

I will ring your doorbell and run away!!!

2006-11-10 22:47:20 · answer #1 · answered by ? 2 · 0 0

Legs

2006-11-11 07:25:13 · answer #2 · answered by Ha Ha! 3 · 0 0

I would be born without arms. You can go anywhere, as long as you have legs. But if you don't have legs, you are confined to a wheelchair and it makes getting around 10X more difficult.

2006-11-11 06:53:53 · answer #3 · answered by noir 3 · 0 0

Legs. I would never be able to cope without arms.

2006-11-11 09:50:38 · answer #4 · answered by lynnca1972 5 · 0 0

I'd choose to be born without people too stupid to read the section headings before posting questions.

2006-11-11 08:48:12 · answer #5 · answered by ? 6 · 1 0

without legs,simply becoz arms very-very useful

2006-11-11 06:58:23 · answer #6 · answered by Latty 1 · 0 0

Legs. Wheelchairs suffice, I would know, I'm in one already.

But without arms, you're helpless and need somebody to do EVERYTHING for you.

2006-11-11 06:44:46 · answer #7 · answered by j3nny3lf 5 · 0 0

legs

2006-11-11 09:40:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hard question can answer that one the though of either is not imaginable.

2006-11-11 07:47:11 · answer #9 · answered by silkieladyinthecity 3 · 0 0

Arms thanks

2006-11-11 09:40:59 · answer #10 · answered by jeff 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers