English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It is said that fulfilling desires is like putting oil in fire.
Putting more and more oil in fire can not extinguish the fire of desires.

Can one really get rid of desires simply by its fulfillments or over-fulfillments ?

What do you think ? What is your opinion and why so ?

2006-11-10 20:02:27 · 13 answers · asked by James 4 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

Hi readers, we have got quite a few good opinions and explanations from quite a good number of people here.

Let me clarify a couple of things.

By getting rid of "desire" I don't mean a particular or just one desire. I mean desires. I mean a state where all desires are gone. No desire is left.

Another thing, some people argue that if you fulfill some desires others spring up.
So this way you can't end desires.

Note : I am NOT suggesting some over-suppression of desires to some inhuman or impractical levels.

I am in favor of living noramlly.

But my question is for example trying to satisfy say your desire for sex by over-indulging in sex, would all of your desires come to an end ?

Can your desires end permanently if you over-indulge in sex ? Can they end that way ?

2006-11-10 20:33:31 · update #1

13 answers

The more you have, the more you will want. That is the curse of human greed, also known as divine dissatisfaction to those who are disillusioned. To answer your question then, no I don't think so. I agree with the saying you quoted above. People are blinded by materialism.

2006-11-10 20:39:41 · answer #1 · answered by boo! 3 · 0 0

Think about the hidden assumptions in that question. For example:

That the desire for thing A I felt five minutes ago is the same desire I feel for thing A now, and related claims (That I want A is one desire, not the result of a bunch of crisscrossing and overlapping desires, or some such, for example)

That "fulfillign" a desire simply mean: to have gotten A AND that the desire went away, or something like this.

Free will. Consciousness isn't epiphenomenal.

My temptation would be to approach a question like tihs just by operationalizing all the terms and doing psychological studies: For the purpose of this experiment, desire will be a reportable subjective phenomon that is called "desire for X" by the subject. When the subject gets X, do they want more X; do they want X and Y? Measure that against a control group, do it for a million objects and desires, and you'll have something to interpret.

2006-11-10 20:16:25 · answer #2 · answered by alrightbye 1 · 0 0

Maybe to get your answer you should google the famous philosopher Epicurus.

Desires are unhealthy in achieving the good life. Because the more we get the more we want . It is exactly what you said about putting oil on the fire.

And in relation to sex you may want to fufill more desires but if you cannot reach these goals it will leave you feeling empty. Which in the long run could leave you feeling depressed which a side affect to this is loss of libido. So chill out and just enjoy what you can get and forget about fufilling un natural desires. And in the long run it would most likely be more fufilling then getting tied up and beaten. lol

2006-11-10 20:57:50 · answer #3 · answered by fifi c 1 · 0 0

I would definitely say yes. After all, a desire is a yearning for something you want, but haven't got. It seems logical that once you have it, you no longer desire it, at least until it's taken away again.

If you mean "desires", in the plural, then I would say no. Some people desire so many things that they'll never be satisfied.

2006-11-10 20:12:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

A desire is a tendency to a thing perceived as good. Each has its own limit. To satisfy this desire to that limit is to do justice to yourself.

To go beyond this limit is always harmful.

In certain circumstances, not to reach this limit is useful as a control over oneself - dominion over oneself.

2006-11-10 20:22:07 · answer #5 · answered by greyshadws 1 · 0 0

you can overcome desires by understanding what cause them.

eg. sex.

sexual desires are caused by sexual hormones running around your body and the release of them is caused by certain environmental (external ) or somtimes internal factors (eg. menstrual cycles) that leads to it if you understand why you are feeling sexually aroused is because its your body causing it, not really you yourself wanting it, you will then learn how to control yourself by differentiating when it is right to indulge in the desire, when it is not appropriate to jump in.

so... you wouldn't have a case of wilddesires or... an unhappy unsatisfied self if you learn to understand the reason behind your desires, what triggers them, and whether this is reasonable or appropriate to go ahead with the desires or not.

it all depends.

2006-11-10 20:47:03 · answer #6 · answered by Spidergurl 4 · 0 0

i think its not the best way to get rid of desires . when u started to fulfill one desire then u will want to have another, it will just increase one's greed. dats why i think to fill up a desire will give birth to another desire. at this point my opinion is dat, when we want something, we have to think dat is it very necessary for me. if its not very important thing then we can forget about dat thing. and always we've to see other people who dont have anything. thus we can control our desire.

2006-11-10 20:16:28 · answer #7 · answered by MoonMoon 1 · 0 0

That argument pans out for megalomaniacs, Narcissists, self-dependent/self-serving egotists and psycho-sociopaths.. notwithstanding the traditional man or woman would not functionality on sheer impulse. They draw close their needs or a minimum of take care of them to a point. favor is better of a motivator than some thing else. And, better-so; that's a reason. favor is likewise loose will. enable's study: Say i'm famish and my kinfolk (spouse and babies) are too on the verge of ravenous. I ensue to hit upon a wonderfully strong can of ham in an alley dumpster. Do I enable my favor to devour draw close me to the point that i will open that would of ham and devour all of it myself then go back abode empty-handed and lie to my spouse and babies that i did not discover some thing to devour that day? Or do I basically take the can of ham abode and enable all of them devour till now I even evaluate taking a chew for myself, if any? both procedure action develop into loose will, distinction is; one develop into finished selfishly..while, the different develop into finished selflessly. If favor incredibly develop into our draw close, each and every man or woman might want to have lengthy killed off each and every man or woman else. we would end to exist. yet unlike animals we've morals. large question!! Peace

2016-10-16 08:32:37 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

yes and no....depends on the people and the desire. Some people are never satisfied, some desires are addicting.

2006-11-10 20:12:01 · answer #9 · answered by ´¯0())))»·.¸¸.·´´¯`··._.· 4 · 0 0

All desire is but carnal man seeking God.Once carnal man surrenders his "his will" to God and receives baptism with spirit,transcending "sin" he will "see" that what he called desire is but the will of God.

2006-11-10 23:08:08 · answer #10 · answered by Weldon 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers