Each of those to be represented must be:
1. a part,
2. a whole,
3. an equivalence,
4. an uniqueness,
5. a tie,
6. a bound,
7. an influence,
8. a sensation,
9. an origin,
10.a derivative,
11. a choice,
12. a determinant,
13. an intent, and
14. a fulfillment.
--------------------------
2006-11-10
18:44:16
·
14 answers
·
asked by
The Knowledge Server
1
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy
Yes, it does not have to be a tie. It could be casual Friday.
2006-11-11 18:51:13
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Each of THESE or( the following) represented must be:
~an uniqueness should be a uniqueness
In the English language, the article "a" is used before a noun that does not begin with a vowel. The article "an" is used before a noun that begins with a vowel to facilitate fluidity in pronouncing the word or sentence with less difficulty or to prevent jagged and curt speech.
ex: An elephant ride at the circus costs ten cents and a plane ride costs twenty-five cents.
In the event of the short "u" we still use "an" to precede the noun.
ex: Do you want an umbrella or a cane?
In the event of the lone "u", we go back to "a" because to say:
ex: "An union group held a strike in front of the court house," is more difficult to say on the tongue and pallet than...
ex: A union group held a strike in front of the court house.
It is the same reason why -ed in the English language has three sounds at the end:
ex: He dressed (t sound at the end of dress) for the part.
ex: She landed (ed sound after land) at one o'clock.
ex: They emptied (d sound after empty) the trash.
To answer your question, the logic is to make it easier to talk.
As for equivalence, I would use "the" in front and if you want "a" change it to equivalent.
As for bound, it's a verb and would become an adjective if you have a noun directly after bound...
ex: A bound foot was what I saw.
I hope I answered your question.
2006-11-11 03:12:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by mustbetoughtobeme 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I agree with mustbetoughtobeme's answer that the article "a" should be used before the word uniqueness. A noun, adjective, or adverb that starts with a long "u" should be preceded with the article "a" while a noun, adjective, or adverb that starts with a short "u" should be preceded with the article "an".
(e.g. "an" understandable statement ---understandable is an adjective that begins with a short "u"
a "universally" accepted proposition ---universally is an adverb that begins with a long "u")
HOWEVER, I disagree with what mustbetoughtobeme said regarding "equivalence" and "bound".
The phrase "A BOUND" is correct. There is nothing wrong there since the word "bound" can be considered as a noun or an adjective depending on its use.
(In calculus, we have what we call a lower bound and upper bound of limits. In the sentence, "Two is a bound of the function." is also the same as "Two is a boundary of the function." --bound here can be a substitute for "boundary". Another example is "a bound and gagged hostage".
Here are the definitions of bound as a noun, an adjective, and a part of an idiom from dictionary.com:
--noun
1. a leap onward or upward; jump.
2. a rebound; bounce
–adjective
3. tied; in bonds: a bound prisoner.
4. made fast as if by a band or bond: She is bound to her family.
5. secured within a cover, as a book.
6. under a legal or moral obligation: He is bound by the terms of the contract.
7. destined; sure; certain: It is bound to happen.
8. determined or resolved: He is bound to go.
9. Pathology. constipated.
10. Mathematics. (of a vector) having a specified initial point as well as magnitude and direction. Compare free (def. 31).
11. held with another element, substance, or material in chemical or physical union.
12. (of a linguistic form) occurring only in combination with other forms, as most affixes.
—Idiom
13. bound up in or with, a. inseparably connected with.
b. devoted or attached to: She is bound up in her teaching)
The phrase "AN EQUIVALENCE" is also correct. There is also nothing wrong there. Equivalence can be considered as a noun or an adjective depending on its use.
(e.g. "An equivalence can be obtained from the following propositions."
Here is a list of definitions of equivalence from dictionary.com:
–noun 1. the state or fact of being equivalent; equality in value, force, significance, etc.
2. an instance of this; an equivalent.
3. Chemistry. the quality of having equal valence.
4. Logic, Mathematics. a. Also called material implication. the relation between two propositions such that the second is not false when the first is true.
b. Also called material equivalence. the relation between two propositions such that they are either both true or both false.
c. the relation between two propositions such that each logically implies the other.
–adjective 5. (of a logical or mathematical relationship) reflexive, symmetrical, and transitive )
Now I am curious as to why you put your question in the "philosophy" category.
What do you mean by "those" in the phrase "each of those to be represented must be"?
Whatever "those" means you should put the word "either" in your opening phrase. Like this:
"Each of those to be represented must either be one of the following:"
Bottomline: change #4 and your opening statement
2006-11-11 04:46:02
·
answer #3
·
answered by karl 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
How many times do you need to ask this?
You are NOT making any logic.
What you have written is nothing more than random nonsense.
I don't mean to, but you are missing something with your lack of understanding the English language.
Get some help from someone who speaks the language or ask the question in your own country forum
2006-11-11 03:01:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by clcalifornia 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bottom line: no, there's no error. You have a 14-place conjunction of predicates that any variable, such that it is represented, must have. Whether some predicates turn out to be contradictory or not takes interpretive steps beyond first order logic.
2006-11-11 02:59:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by -.- 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
#4 .... A uniqueness. use A before words starting with a vowel, AND words starting with the letter U. use an before words starting with a consanant, EXCEPT the letter H.
2006-11-11 02:58:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by iwondersoiask 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There's nothing sensible about what you've said, at least not to me.
What do the words mean?; it's clear that they don't mean what one would ordinarily mean.
2006-11-11 03:03:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by alrightbye 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Learn to speak a language before you ask a question.
You are clueless.
NO sense to any of this.
You are obcessed.
STOP please you are driving us nuts
2006-11-12 02:05:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no there is not, it is a list
2006-11-11 02:48:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by R & B 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
can we say them as a statement? i think its not a statement, its a list!!!
2006-11-11 04:33:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by MoonMoon 1
·
0⤊
0⤋