2006-11-10 17:14:59 · 7 answers · asked by dev s 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The UN is a toy for the rich countries that keep it in existence. Without funding from the US, the UN would be even less viable than it is now. Do you have an example of this toying or is it just your impression?
2006-11-10 17:22:35 · answer #1 · answered by Griff 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
We are paying 28% of UN budget,in addition to millions more for peace keeping forces around the world.We want to be sure that money is well spent.
2006-11-12 01:38:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jiski laathi uski bhains.
Means "might is right"
right now US is in power, UN, WORLD BANK, UNESCO etc are toys in hand of America.
2006-11-10 17:29:59 · answer #3 · answered by vinisha v 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Americans have no qualms about using all the world bodies to suit their needs and policies. They do not distinguish between American interests and the international obligations. They have extended the theory of national self-interest a little too far in international politics.
2006-11-10 19:28:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Give an example....if you can contrive one.
Of what use is that corrupt organization,
That glorified debating club to us?
2006-11-10 17:24:25 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
ITS ALL EXPENDITURES ARE BORN BY THE USA.
2006-11-13 02:30:27 · answer #6 · answered by RAMAN IOBIAN 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They aren't. Why do you say this?
2006-11-10 17:22:41 · answer #7 · answered by Greg 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋