Optimist or pessimist paradox?

Question

Consider person A and B, A is optimist, B is pessimist. Theoretically, B needs some advice to become optimistic, and psychologists proudly say B can do so by having positive thoughts. I suggest that this is a paradox itself.

Lemma 1: If B is pessimistic, it is because the surroundings has influenced him in the negative ways (like always fail in doing something) that inductive knowledge suggests that B is not going to do any good in subsequent attempts.

Lemma 2: B might be pessimistic because of his genetics (such as autism which causes failure in social context and leads to poor self esteem).

The problem here is B is not able to think positively because he is in a condition where the way of thinking doesn't have any real outcome (just eg. if u don't study for your exam, having positive thoughts doesn't make u score better).

My point is psychologists always miss the point. A pessimist always want happiness but not a fabricated happiness in the mind. Unless the world starts to give positive feedbacks to what pessimists have done, having positive thoughts doesn't make a pessimist become an optimist because his life is still the same as before. What a psychologist want a pessimist to do is just to be contented with his own failure and be happy. This is something wrong.

Answer 1

Oh, you forgot the meds that will be inflicted upon the pessimist- he is antisocial, if young, he is not doing well in school and can become a social outcast as he grows older.

There are peoplle who are pessimistic because they just are. It is in their very core of beliefs ( I mean disbeliefs). Just as you cant change a gay person into truly becoming a straight person- the thoughts and feelings are deeply seeded, the same is true for pessimists. As with any mental disorder, the psychs are just guessing or throwing darts trying to hit a bullseye as far as the correct form of treatment and/or medication.

I say let them be- just like the gays, and the straights- they are not harmful by their thought processes- and since it is not a learned process, they have been that way since birth.

Answer 2

SETI makes use of passive listening, with the intention to easily detect a civilization it really is actively transmitting radio alerts into area. There are some limitations which could avert us from detecting them. a million) different civilization must be utilizing radio transmissions. they could have got here upon another kind of verbal substitute. 2) Civilizations may not very last very lengthy after coming up radio technologies. the first radio in the international with sufficient potential to go away the ambience replaced into used in 1935. interior of 5 years, earth developed the technologies required for self destruction of the total earth. that is conceivable that civilizations instantly ruin themselves after inventing radios. 3) most of the planets we've got here upon that are even remotely earth like are 1000's of light years away. If we despatched them a message, and they were waiting to appreciate it and reply, we does not get a reaction for over a millennium.

Answer 3

the lack of motivation will make anyone pessimistic...but because there is 10 points for the best answer im a bit optmistic..lmaoo

Answer 4

No one knows how another person feels and they make a big mistake when they try to analyze another persons thoughts or try to manipulate them.

Answer 5

I agree. I hate when people say, "Just believe in yourself and you'll do fine," because sorry, but that's sometimes just crap.

Answer 6

that hurt my head