According to her bio on imdb.com, her two children are adopted, so I guess not. Maybe she just put on some weight and was trying to hide it.
2006-11-10 13:01:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by capnbeatty 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
No She Was Not Pregnant,But Right Around That Time She Did A Photo Layout For A Magazine To Show Her True Body Self & What Hollywood Make-Up Can Do To To Cover Up ImPerfections
In Our Celebrties
2006-11-10 13:07:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by wyquette 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jamie Curtis doesn't have biological kids, so I'm guessing no...
However just look at Courtney Cox Arquette during the last few episodes of Friends... now that was some obvious pregnant belly camouflage ;)
2006-11-10 13:05:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by ♥ AnGeL oF cLaRiTy ♥ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Believe it or not, Jamie Lee Curtis was born without "girl parts"! This is no joke, very few people know this. All of her kids are adopted.
2006-11-10 12:59:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by clamcrunchies2 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
well the camera adds 10 pounds literally so maybe its just the camera lindsay looks heavier too and also thats why a lot of celebetries are skinny
2006-11-10 13:05:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by : ] be happy 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Nope. We would've heard about a baby by now.
2006-11-10 13:15:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by teeney1116 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
shes too old to have kids
2006-11-10 13:12:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kel Kel 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
am watchin it too and she seems normal to me
2006-11-10 12:58:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I know what you mean. But i don't know.
2006-11-10 13:15:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by strawberry 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no i don't think so ,i don't think she can have children
2006-11-10 13:02:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by evian 6
·
0⤊
0⤋