YES! Al Qaeda today released a video claiming that the Democrats winning the election meant that they would in in Iraq.
2006-11-10 12:25:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
0⤋
I think not. It's a victory for working American men, women and families. Republicans give lip service to being the only party with moral values and want you to believe that democrats are left-wing communist who don't read their Bibles nor believe in God. But if it were up to the anti-family republican agenda there would be no social-security or an increase in the minimum wage for working Americans who are trying desperately to raise and provide for their children.
And don't let them (republicans) fool you on the abortion issue either. It's a big smoke screen that gets the average American's eye off the ball so that they vote for politicians that deep down don't have any of their interest at heart. The same can be said for certain democrats as well. Be an independent thinker and vote for the person, not a party or platform.
That said, the bottom line for the Republican party is about cozying up to big business and high-powered lobbyist. I wish "consevatives" would quit buying into the likes of propogandists like Rush Limbaugh and Shawn Hannity. Their half-truths, lies and spin are politically motivated.
2006-11-10 13:03:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by soulguy85 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually if the liberal congress decides to cut and run the Iraqi Shiites and Kurds will take over the fight and wipe the Iraqi Sunni insurgents (& foreign terrorists) who they hate off the face off the earth without losing even one US troop. How ironic it would be it if Shiite/kurd Muslims win the war on terror in Iraq for the US?
2006-11-10 12:32:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The liberals do not favor victory in Iraq. that is all about potential. they could choke formerly they could enable Bush triumph in something. all of it is going decrease back to the 2000 election that they insist sayanythingAl Gore replaced into meant to win, and in view that then, they have quite somewhat vowed to oppose any and all issues that the president has tried to commence. that is been a hate marketing campaign from day one among his presidency. 9-11 drew them up short, yet once they stuck their breath from operating for his or her lives from the capital homes, it did not take lengthy for the detest marketing campaign to commence again. and clearly the obedient toadies of our honest, and impartial lieberal press flow good alongside with all of it. A republican victory might want to be lack of existence to them. after all, purely the lieberals have the moral authority to settle on what's better for the rustic. purely the lieberals have the moral authority to communicate with aggressors and pay interest, and acquiesce, and appease their demands, no matter if those demands are that we need to be murdered. purely the lieberals have the moral authority to handcuff our infantrymen, even as putting forward how a lot they help them, and that our lives are not well worth sqwat because peace is continually the finest attitude, "if purely shall we get them to reason with us." If we lose some thousand extra innocuous civilian adult adult males, women people and little ones in yet another 9-11 kind tradgedy, the lieberals received't take any duty, they'll purely blame bush. because purely the lieberals have the moral authority to declare credit for that which succeeds, and blame others for that which fails.
2016-11-29 00:31:59
·
answer #4
·
answered by england 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Having Bush as a president is a victory for the Iraqi insurgency.
2006-11-10 12:25:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Brett Favre 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
No, the Iraqi insurgency was doing just fine with the republicans in charge.
"President" Bush will now be held accountable for his stupid decisions which is a victory for all of us.
2006-11-10 12:32:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Andibo 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
YES, and just watch how much worse it will be for our troops in Iraq, and the citizens of America. A very bad choice was made by the American people in electing LIBERALS to run are country. These LIBS live in a fantasy land.
2006-11-10 13:04:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's what al Qaeda seems to think. That's why the insurgents scaled up their attacks against civilian & military targets over the last couple of months, they were actively trying to sway the American public to put the Democrats in power.
And it worked. Isn't that great?
2006-11-10 12:30:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by My Evil Twin 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Should the people we elect serve the puppet regime of Iraq or the people who put them in office? The citizens of The United States of America.
2006-11-10 12:28:50
·
answer #9
·
answered by djmantx 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
the democrats who took the seats were moderate democrats so your argument of liberal congress is false, plus it wasn't like Iraq was going smoothly before the elections.
2006-11-10 12:58:07
·
answer #10
·
answered by Mr.happy 4
·
0⤊
0⤋