ANWAR wouldn't supply enough oil to make a difference.
Actually, Bush started saying that if we left Iraq, the terrorists would get the oil now.
2006-11-10 12:25:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by cassandra 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
you are able to nonetheless say that the Iraq conflict replaced into no longer approximately getting Iraqi Oil to bypass U.S. clientele gas tanks. What can't be disputed is that Dick Cheney and the Oil business enterprise Executives met in March, 2001 to plot dividing Iraq's Oil fields. administration of the Oil Spigots to learn U.S. Oil agencies is distinctive than any benefit to U.S. clientele. A tightened administration of the spigots will advance expenditures and salary. The Hydrocarbon Benchmark that the two Bush and Hillary are pressing Iraq's government to bypass is approximately privatizing Iraq's oil fields. "different than for 3 scant lines, the complete 33 web site "Hydrocarbon regulation," is approximately starting to be a complicated criminal shape to facilitate the privatization of Iraqi oil. As such, it in crucial that each and everyone human beings heavily examine the Iraqi Parliament's bill through fact the Congress is on the checklist in merchandising oil privatization. This conflict is approximately oil. " Dennis Kucinich in Congress
2016-12-10 06:48:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by sickels 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes he did say one of the reasons we went to war was to keep oil prices low so the Democrats in there big SUV's would quit crying. A long time secret friend of his, Nancy Pelosi, said to him," George you have such strong arms, and I love running my fingers throught your hair. Will you go and kick some Iraqi a-s-s for me.' George said,'Sure I will Nancy, you have the whitest teeth I have ever come across.
2006-11-10 12:33:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO! That can be accomplished by drilling OUR own oil offshore and in ANWAR! We would stop funding the Middle East problems this way also!
2006-11-10 12:22:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bawney 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO. This is just sick.
He said we needed to stay in Iraq so the terrorists did not control the oil.
2006-11-10 12:22:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
BUSH INVADED IRAQ TO IMPRESS JODIE FOSTER.
2006-11-10 14:43:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by iknowtruthismine 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Really? It's funny how you don't have any sources.
2006-11-10 12:21:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by Luekas 4
·
4⤊
0⤋
No, he never said that.... Where do you get your info from...
2006-11-10 12:21:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by Katz 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
No. It wasn't.
2006-11-10 15:17:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
no
2006-11-10 12:38:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋