English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

These people are so morally, ethically, culturally and economically bankrupt that they impose such a net negative social cost on society that the only way to protect society is enforced mass sterilisation.

I know the idea is morally reprehenisble. But I genuinely believe that allowing these people to reproduce will create a nightmare society. Just look at what's happened to British society over the last 15 years as these people have been allowed to propogate.

I say that having chlildren is a privelege, not a right.

2006-11-10 12:17:25 · 22 answers · asked by sparky 2 in Society & Culture Cultures & Groups Other - Cultures & Groups

22 answers

What are Chavs? I live in America.

I agree with you if you substitute "Hood rat" for Chav.

2006-11-10 12:20:51 · answer #1 · answered by TrainerMan 5 · 0 0

Are you Boris Johnston? That comical tory guy. However flowerly you make ur stand here, it is not a good thing to say. You already admit the morals are wrong.

Well I would say that the children nowadays are the ones created by the people that lived in Thatchers era. The woman that said "theres no such thing as society" Many negative things happened in that government.

What happens when your kids decide to act the way you don't like? Will u not allow them to reproduce. Human beings live to reproduce.

2006-11-10 12:27:03 · answer #2 · answered by Lazarus 2 · 0 0

Firstly for all of you who have no idea what chavs are: They Are younsters from the ages (usually) 11-19. They hang round shops causing havoc. Starting on, or robbing everyone for no reason because they are in big gangs. And by everyone I even mean old age pensioners! As for the silver spoon comment that's irrelevant less money doesn't mean you have to attack innocent people!

I can't agree with your comment about enforced sterilisation it's a little extreme to say the least. But your right something has to be done. Something drastic.

2006-11-10 13:42:50 · answer #3 · answered by born2survive 2 · 1 0

I think you have a fair point. There are areas in the UK where many peopl hvae child after child without any consideration as to how they are going to afford it. Annoying many come to the conclusion that they will get benefits for this that and the other and given a council house to live in. They contribute nothing to the country and the hardworking taxpayer has to foot the bill. This is a problem that needs addressed by the government as they just seem to chuck money at these people , yet it is costing everybody millions of pounds each year.

2006-11-10 22:28:19 · answer #4 · answered by TB 5 · 1 0

I am english and do not know what you mean by chaves. it is a difficult one some cultures feel reproducing may babys is their only life. my doughter sugested some with learning dificultys should be steralised I did not feel that is right either. but posible if the state was not suporting every one there would be less childredn, or more would die. obviusly no one wonts babys to die as they do in the third world but if adults wont take available prcortions what can we do??

2006-11-10 19:38:33 · answer #5 · answered by Sam's 6 · 0 0

I agree, chavs are having 4 or 5 kids whereas the decent people in this country are having 1 or 2 (not true in all cases of course) they are out-breeding us, and one day maybe not too far down the line, i believe so many people will be claiming benefits that the tax payers among us will be unable to support them, where will that leave this country then?

2006-11-10 12:22:43 · answer #6 · answered by matt151091 2 · 2 1

Good idea, but then who would we laugh at? No more Wayne and Waynetta slob, no more Vicky Pollard. Goodbye and good riddance to Mr, Mrs and baby Burberry. Oh wait though, whos gonna work in Mcdonalds now?

2006-11-10 12:24:19 · answer #7 · answered by bethanie_25_uk 2 · 1 0

Definately.

2006-11-10 12:26:43 · answer #8 · answered by mistickle17 5 · 1 1

Agreed! Makes perfect sense in fact!

2006-11-10 12:23:03 · answer #9 · answered by Ollie 5 · 1 0

Regardless, (I don't know who the Chavs is ) but no one should be forced to have the choice taken away on having a child.

2006-11-10 12:23:28 · answer #10 · answered by newcovenant0 5 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers