English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

11 answers

No reason to waste money on trials, shoot them.

2006-11-10 10:59:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Gosh, I thought that whole thing was debunked months ago! Didn't you get the memo?

Even the Dems have forgotten about that one! I mean, did you hear anyone talk about it in the last election?

She and her hubby are so p*ssed that they've been abandoned by the Left and the Dems that they're moving out of DC.

So, the answer would be... NO. And, the lack of substantial indictiments by a special prosecutor say "no" as well. Charges against Scooter Libby will no doubt be dropped sometime soon as well, as he's current charged with covering up a crime that didn't happen.

2006-11-10 19:03:10 · answer #2 · answered by geek49203 6 · 1 0

It was Richard Armitage. He explained to the prosecutor that he had done it. The prosecutor brought no charges. The claim made by her husband that the WH had done it was all in his imagination. She suffered no harm, and no operations were blown. She was not really a covert operative in the true sense. It was all a teapot tempest exploded out of proportion for cheap political gain. But it made a good story for a while, and that is all the selfish journalists care about. Truth be damned.

2006-11-10 19:04:34 · answer #3 · answered by artaxerxes-solon 3 · 1 0

Only if the NY Times are charged for treason by getting leaked information about tracking terrorists' finances, and then reporting it.

.

2006-11-11 05:30:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Should the entire New York Times? I think so!

2006-11-10 19:10:57 · answer #5 · answered by SGT 3 · 0 0

It was Bush who gave the order to Cheney. And Bush will walk free from everything. Mark my words.

2006-11-10 19:38:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Yes.

2006-11-10 19:03:31 · answer #7 · answered by Mojo Seeker Of Knowlege 7 · 0 1

Yes.

2006-11-10 18:59:53 · answer #8 · answered by czekoskwigel 5 · 1 2

No. A much more minor charge would be appropriate.

2006-11-10 18:59:47 · answer #9 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 2 2

there's no way bush will allow rove to be prosecuted. rove is the puppet master.

2006-11-10 19:01:48 · answer #10 · answered by pot paw 2 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers