English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

i know they only lost two games but why dont they look good unless there is a vick at QB (marcus,mike) combined there record is 31-3 but with other QB's 1999 till now is 37-15 what's up with that are they just not that good without scrambling QB's

2006-11-10 10:02:06 · 2 answers · asked by redster 2 in Sports Football (American)

2 answers

this year VT has styled themselves around a pocket passer. Problem is the O-line cannot
provide a pocket much less do any real run blocking. Frank Beamer has a history of trying to put the square peg in the round hole. I can tell you have done a little research, so consider this : J. Druckenmiller and B. Randall both rode the pine behind QBs that were not as able
to get the job done just as I. Whitaker is doing now.

2006-11-10 12:03:54 · answer #1 · answered by bullet head 2 · 0 0

a VICK? Sorry Only one Vick ever helped and that was because nothing else was happening at the time, and because no one on staff had a clue what to do with a star potential, and almost destroyed him. That was Micheal. Marcus never added squat to the program. A shame he fell into his bro's hype and never had a chance to be an athelete in his own right. He might have had something to offer the sport besides controversy.
VT's as ok as it ever was, struggle to get the team off the bus to play ball or wipe 'em out without batting an eye. Two games with out a personal foul?? I love it.

2006-11-11 15:29:12 · answer #2 · answered by character 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers