2006-11-10 08:58:16 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
he was inhuman he should die that way
he chose his own path
2006-11-10 09:06:06 · answer #1 · answered by Talking Hat 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. You apparently do not oppose the Death Penalty in certain instances. You need to self-examine why that is. And guess what, there's nothing wrong with being pro-death penalty. Doesn't make you a bad person. So if you "oppose" the Death Penalty because you think that makes you a good person, or because you've been brainwashed to think that way, re-think it.
2006-11-10 09:02:08 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i don't help it for many motives, yet that's the greater suitable compelling. persons are fallible and, no count quantity how not straightforward we attempt to get rid of the possibility of executing an possibility unfastened guy or lady, it won't in any admire bypass away. homicide expenditures are greater beneficial in states (and in any diverse case comparable international places) that have the dying penalty than in those with out it. As for deterrence, it has by no potential been shown to be any greater beneficial useful in deterring potential criminals than diverse punishments. for human beings without a judgment of effective and incorrect, the greater suitable perfect deterrent is the fear of being caught. existence with out parole additionally retains the worst criminals off the streets. It ability precisely what it says. Its significant income: If we come across an possibility unfastened guy or lady in detention center he may well be released.
2016-11-23 14:38:55 · answer #3 · answered by kennie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course it's wrong. For one thing, we've determined in this country that because of some very BAD incidents of people hanging without dying for a very very long time, that "death by hanging" is cruel and unusual and we've outlawed it even in those states that still use capital punishment. (Actually, I believe **** and Perry from the "In Cold Blood" incident hanging for 18 and 20 minutes prior to death were a large part of the reason we've banned it.)
And of course, he'll never die anyway. He has unlimited appeals, so will never really face his sentence. Therefore, it's a moot point.
2006-11-10 09:03:55 · answer #4 · answered by CuteWriter 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Death is free pass to where he is heading. He probably has a lot of his own ppl in the same place and he could contest the power of the Devil and take over, then what is going to happen? As it is the devil has no boundaries and God is kind of keep away from the fire, he should forgive the devil one party and then the whole world will be free of evil doing. Prey to God for forgiveness to the devil and regain his heavenly place wherever is located.
2006-11-10 09:14:01 · answer #5 · answered by antonioavilakiss 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's inconsistent. I oppose the death penalty for anyone, Saddam is no different.
2006-11-10 09:00:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It seems you really are not opposed to the death penalty.
2006-11-10 09:05:56 · answer #7 · answered by kittykatty 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not really possible for anyone to tell you if your feelings are right or wrong; that depends very much on your own morals and views on life. I'm not personally happy about it -really just kind of indifferent. But that doesn't mean what you feel about it is wrong. I don't agree with apologizing for emotion.
2006-11-10 09:04:57 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
he deserves it...and any murder does. thats why i support the death penalty. They take up too much space in prison too if kept in there for a lifetime.
2006-11-10 09:06:12 · answer #9 · answered by Dead Birds Don't Poop 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the death penalty should be mandatory for any act of terrorism
2006-11-10 09:00:39 · answer #10 · answered by lobo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Isn't he being hanged in front of his own people? Cause if he is then this is by far better then any jail time.
2006-11-10 09:05:49 · answer #11 · answered by Andrew B. 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋