Is the History Of Nibiru Credible?

Question

Sumerian text explains where Nibiru is: Planet Marduk
Upon its appearance: Mercury.Rising 30 degrees of the celestial arc: Jupiter. When standing in the place of the celestial battle:
Nibiru These instructions for observing the incoming planet clearly refer to its progression from an alignment with Mercury to an alignment with Jupiter by rising 30 degrees.

This could happen only if the orbit of Nibiru/Marduk is inclined 30 degrees to the ecliptic. Appearing 30 degrees above the ecliptic and disappearing (to a viewer in Mesopotamia) 30 degrees below it, creates the "Way of Anu", which forms a band extending 30 degrees above and below the equator. The thirtieth parallel north, was a "sacred" line along which the spaceport in the Sinai peninsula, the great pyramids of Giza, ad the gaze of the Sphinx were located. It seems plausible that the alignment had to do with Nibiru's position, 30 degrees in the northern skies, as it reached the perihelion in its orbit.

Is this Possible?

In his book 'Gods Of The New Millennium' Alan F. Alford has thoroughly calculated that it was the year 10,983 BC that a great flood occurred, there is also archeological evidence of a pole shift or flip around 13,000 years ago (approx. half of one Great Year, 25,920). He displayed a clever pattern of logical thinking with these calculations. He tells us that a 'Sar' the holy period, which the ancient Sumerians illustrated as a circle, and which according
to Sitchin represented 3,600 years, should be written as 2,160 and not as 3,600. If you take a number out of the Sumerian sexagesimal system of numbers and want to start calculating with it in our 10 number system, then you have to convert it first.

The Sumerian sexigesimal system of numbers works with changing factors that increase by 6 and 10.

This structure looked like the following:

1, 10, 60, 600, 3,600, 36,000, 216,000 etc.

Every other preceding number is multiplied by 6 or 10.

What do U thinK?

Answer 1

50%-50%.

Answer 2

Planet Marduk Upon its appearance: Mercury.Rising 30 degrees of the celestial arc: Jupiter. When standing in the place of the celestial battle

is not clear at all! How can you say that is clear? "Rising 30 degrees of the celestial arc" does NOT clearly say 30 degrees inclines to the ecliptic for example.

Answer 3

Doesn't sound plausible for a planet, but might make sense for a comet-sized object. Ideally a comet expanding to visible size by evaporation.

Using fixed locations on earth as markers sort of ignores earth rotation. Unless the sun stood still over Gilead, not plausible.

When dealing with astronomical orientations for archaeological objects older than a few hundred years, you'll have to take the wobbling of earth's rotational axis into account. About 2000BC, the axis went through Thuban rather than Pole Star. Go calculate that frame of reference...

Answer 4

Pretty wild question, I say.

I've "been into" astronomy since 1944, and this is the 1st time for seeing such an involved ?question.
I suggest you consult a professional astronomer.

Answer 5

No.

I'm a fan too, and its still not possible :/ Read the books by Zecharia Sitchin (although you probably have). Complex gravity movements by Jupiter and the other planets just don't allow for any none solar Planet that isn't extra-solar in origin (outside the solar system).