was there as much, or even close to,the amount of hate and venom spewed at clinton as there is at bush?
i know he was impeached (impeached not tried) for lieing to the grand jury(doesn't matter what it was about) but i don't recall the day after day insults,derogatory remarks.
2006-11-10
06:01:08
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Government
i hate it when i can't determine if the question was read and understood.i still haven't seen anyone tell me that clinton was called stupid,warmonger(serbia),want to kill him,worst president etc. he was a liar no matter how or by whom he was found out.
2006-11-10
07:28:00 ·
update #1
nope,
there was a poll.
80% of people in the media are dem-o-cants
so you can guess, clinton only got 20% of the bad press.
2006-11-10 06:59:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Quiz Master 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes, and it continues!! They are still trying to blame him for things he is not to blame for and some really have their facts screwed up!
Like they say he was impeached! He was never impeached. No president has been impeached! He was tried and the House did not have the required 2/3 vote to impeach him!
They say he was impeached because he lied to congress! Not true. They tried to impeach him on the basis of a perjury charge which arose from Clinton's testimony about his relationship to Monica Lewinsky during a sexual harassment lawsuit brought by former Arkansas-state employee Paula Jones. It was a civil trial!
They love to slander and lie about him, but he will go down in history as leaving this country better off than he found it! Bush will never be able to say that!
And they still do it! He hasn't been president for 6 years!
2006-11-10 06:15:01
·
answer #2
·
answered by cantcu 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Oh, sure. The Republicans threw tremendous amouts of venom at Clinton, and sicked their bloodhound Ken Star on him to push him around until he did something they could impeach him for.
Of course, we didn't have Yahoo Answers then. So most of the complaints that the public saw were not as slanderous, being published in the print media and therefore subject to editorial review.
2006-11-10 06:07:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by Chredon 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Refresh you memory? Look around. People are still blaming everything short of the Lindbergh kidnapping on Clinton. What Bush has had to put up with is nothing in comparison. The difference is that neo-cons have found that the 'persecution card' ("hate") plays well with their cowardly, little puppets.
2006-11-10 06:21:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I lean Republican and conservative, but I think Clinton got his share of insults.
I do think it's worse now.
I voted for Clinton in 1992 and 1996, then third-party in 2000, and Bush in 2004.
Oddly enough, every time I feel the president is not doing so well, his detractors overplay their hand and make me want to come to his defense.
Politics is just a subcategory of psychology.
2006-11-10 06:04:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
once you're including what you want to do is locate GCD (most suitable difficulty-loose Denominator) so between 3 and eight might want to be 24. because they both percentage that diverse. then you diverse both by 8 and the a million by 3. so as that your fractions are not replacing then purely upload the numerator. 2/3 + a million/8. 2/(3*8) + a million/(8*3)= 2/24 + a million/24. yet then the tops. (2*8)/24 + (a million*3)/24= 16/24 + 3/24. then upload to get 19/24.
2016-11-29 00:18:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes I think so but Clinton days are over and Bush is still around, people are tired of mean mouthing Clinton...
2006-11-10 06:04:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by StarShine G 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think there was as much.
Ken Starr investigated Clinton for years. Clinton lied during embarrassing testimony about personal behavior that came up from a very zealous special prosecutor. I would say he was railroaded as much as he lied.
That being said. Bush has certainly been treated unfairly. Often by me (although I don't think he knew I was talking about him).
2006-11-10 06:06:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by imnogeniusbutt 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Clinton is gone and he won't be coming back. It no longer matters. We have to focus on only what is happening today and our future. Our past doesn't help us.
2006-11-10 06:06:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
By the media, NO! For the most part, they wished they were the ones on their knees under the desk.
2006-11-10 07:00:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by roger k 2
·
0⤊
0⤋