2006-11-10 05:47:49 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Those movies are my favorites! Part 3 is my fave, then part 1, last is part 2. I'd like a BTTF part 4 only if Michael J Fox was in it and Christopher Lloyd.
2006-11-10 05:54:41 · answer #1 · answered by iluvmynotebook 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
certainly not. why tamper with a classic? besides there are two main reasons: a) the actors are in their 40s or in the case of christopher lloyd 50s and b) michael j fox has parkinsons and he would therefore be in no physical condition to resume the marty mcfly role.
plus, i don't want other actors taking their place, nor for the directors to make a new up-to-date version of back to the future. regardless of whether they do or not, it is not going to work and anyway, its never going to be as good as the first film. the series came to an end with the third one, way back in 1990, so i personally think its better if they'd left it to rest in peace.
2006-11-10 14:04:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh, definitely. It was hinted at in the other movies that Marty's kids were all screwed up. But this time I think kids now should travel back to the eighties to help their parents out, but it should be another family and a new, maybe great nephew of Prof. Brown. I always thought that movie was a cool concept, so why not bring back the franchise, albeit tweaked a little?
2006-11-10 13:57:42 · answer #3 · answered by inquiringmind 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sure, why not. Michael J. Fox wouldn't be able to continue his role as Marty due to his illness but the studio could introduce Marty's kid(s) as the starring character. They could send the character back in time......to the 80's. The time the original movie started off. I hope part 4 comes out before the remake does!
2006-11-10 13:57:10 · answer #4 · answered by Ozzie B. 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't think Michael J. Fox is up to it. He could maybe cameo, but I think it stands well as a trilogy and the third one was a little pushed. Leave it alone, I'd rather see Indiana Jones 4:The Fate of Atlantis. Or Aliens 5(6?), or Jason vs. Freddy 2, know that can be campy without ruining prior work.
hehehe.
2006-11-10 13:50:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Back to the Future would not be the same without Michael J Fox and he's probably not up to it. So I'd say no.....
2006-11-10 13:54:35 · answer #6 · answered by scoot_478 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No, it wouldn't seem right to make one without Michael J. Fox, who clearly is in no position to be acting, and the second and third "Back to the Futures" weren't any good anyway.
2006-11-10 13:50:32 · answer #7 · answered by Lezalicious 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
How could they make one when Michael Fox is not able to function like he used to? It would be very difficult and probably very disappointing. I think it would make Michael Fox feel bad because he can't perform the way he used to.
2006-11-10 13:56:14 · answer #8 · answered by Tatochka 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I would have to vote no. With Michael J. Fox's illness, I don't know if I could watch. It just doesn't seem right for some reason.
2006-11-10 13:52:47 · answer #9 · answered by Big Dog03 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Only if they could get Fox but I know he has health issues so I would say no way. That was a good series, dont mess with success.
2006-11-10 13:49:38 · answer #10 · answered by KittyKattsMeow 3 · 6⤊ 0⤋