2006-11-10 04:25:35 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
I love a dangerous crime, though my client didn't commit it because I won the case. As long as I make money though malam ence and malam prohibitum won't be a factor.
2006-11-10 18:05:16 · answer #1 · answered by Professor Sheed 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As a lawyer, it doesn't matter, I would represent my client with vigor and within the law. However, as a human being, I would rather represent one who has committed a regulatory action. Criminals are bad either way, but some of the crimes out there would make it very difficult. There's money in both.
2006-11-10 12:32:31 · answer #2 · answered by straightup 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Regular infraction with a lot of money. The reason behind this is that if a client committed a serious crime on someone, there is a great possibility that it does the same act on me too.
2006-11-10 12:29:46 · answer #3 · answered by Kat 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A dangerous crime. They're more interesting. I don't care about the money part of it. I'd like to speak to the defendent and get inside his mind, find out why he did whatever it was... and use my intellect to create a situation which would have made him think like that, and act as he did. Psycology has always facinated me, especially with serial killers and such.
2006-11-10 12:36:48 · answer #4 · answered by Ophelia 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on the specific facts of the case and the person that is accused.
2006-11-10 12:32:53 · answer #5 · answered by strangedaze23 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a client with lots of money you can siphon!
2006-11-10 12:27:34 · answer #6 · answered by David B 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋