English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why did the trial of milosevic keep going when Clinton found out that the atrocities in Bosnia were self inflicted. He still helped Bin laden set up staging and training facilities in Bosnia - even the los angeles times and washington papers printed this (for one day)
and the opium trade grew.

2006-11-10 03:52:55 · 6 answers · asked by dewar1963 1 in Arts & Humanities History

6 answers

i didn´t know he helped bin laden setting up facilities i bosnia.

2006-11-10 04:01:41 · answer #1 · answered by whothatBE 4 · 1 1

The bombing of Serbia was for sure one unfair "political" solution to protect Albanians in Kosovo. Many Innocent people died because of that. However, Milosevic was accused for war crimes, committed by Serbian soldiers over the Muslims, while he was leading the country, and this is something different. Unfortunately, both, Clinton and Milosevic escaped the face of justice...

However, not only Christians were killed in bombing, but Muslims, Jews and members of other confessions - and atheists too, and they certainly deserve the same apology.

2006-11-10 15:04:37 · answer #2 · answered by Aurora 4 · 0 0

Gee... I thought it was mostly Serbian militias who were killing Muslim Bosnians :-? Either way, it was a FUBAR area.

Milosevic's trial was under the auspices of the WORLD COURT... not Clinton.

I love how some think a US President owes an aplogy for things that occur in EUROPE (or Asia)... not an apology from a FRENCH President who refused to involve HIS country in the area until the US led NATO into the problem.

2006-11-10 12:36:57 · answer #3 · answered by mariner31 7 · 0 1

First: Bill wasn't really running the white house, Hiliary was.
Second: He wasn't sorry for any of the crap he let happen. You can blame him for the younger generation believing that oral sex isn't sex. I have heard that one too many times from the kids today.
Third: Has he apologized for anything? Supposedly he passed all the information on concerning possible attacks on the WTC's, and it was Bush's fault it happened. Why didn't he do something about it initially? Why did he just let that information get lost in the shuffle?

2006-11-10 12:00:47 · answer #4 · answered by wzrdsndrgns 3 · 1 1

It wasn't Clinton's fault; don't blame it on him. It's like blaming Bush for the murder of Muslims.

2006-11-10 12:01:08 · answer #5 · answered by chrstnwrtr 7 · 1 1

well he DIDN'T!
I LIVE IN SERBIA SO I SHOULD KNOW!

2006-11-10 13:32:01 · answer #6 · answered by witch_dea 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers