I know people who consider it an absolute truth that Bush won by voting fraud. With that being the case, The republican senators who just got spanked at the polls should have been able to employ the same methods to maintain control, right?
2006-11-10
00:53:05
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Raalnan5
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Elections
One respondant claimed that I was whining. I wanted to be clear on the nature of this question. I am not intending to whine, just sort out the logic of the situation. Another claimed that the fraud was not used because 'the people know now.' That sounds like something a child would say. Is it time for the 'force field'? If there were fraud last time, and the Republicrats wanted to do it again without losing power (note that keeping power is the real objective here), why wouldn't they have simply lost some elections, or won by a small margin, rather than being ousted?
2006-11-10
01:10:15 ·
update #1
RoseSpectre666 also claims that the republicans are the 'conspiracy theory' party. I guess she must have missed a few of the events that would seem to prove otherwist, namely 1. claims of a 'vast right wing conspiracy' by Hillary Klinton, when the true conspiracy was a Democrat lie. 2. Claims that Bush was responsible for 9-11 by Democrats, despite the fact that 911 had been in planning, and even attempted prior to Bush's election. 3. claims that Bush has a Hurricane machine that sent Katrina. 4. Claims that Bush blew up the levies when his hurricane machine sent Katrina. This is the part where you Democrats should get flustered and tell me to get off the topic of Klinton purgery, since it was so long ago, and he only lied about sex. I will, but I will also point out that while he was distracted by a girl his daughter's age, 9-11 was in planning.
2006-11-10
01:18:57 ·
update #2