I don't think so.
The american voters have just shown what they think of his contrabution to how the rest of the world no think of the USA
2006-11-09 22:06:54 · 13 answers · asked by NORMAN M 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
as per the recent poll conducted by the guardian news paper, bush outranked the presidents of Iran and north Korea who are regarded as danger to world peace. the poll was conducted in Canada, Israel, the UK and the USA and in some countries he was second to osama. the peace loving , democratic people of the USA sent signals to the world that they do not approve bush's policy in Iraq. the number of civilians killed is not 150000 but more than 600000 and all third world countries must unite and denounce bush's policy in Iraq and bring pressure on the UN to establish an international tribune for the trial of bush for war crimes in Iraq.
2006-11-09 22:45:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 17⤊ 0⤋
That's 150,000 civilians killed by rebels. It really is Bush's policies that contributing to that environment. Iraq needs regional support and the US should be actively involved in that process. There should not be any hanky pankies in that process from the US side. The Arabs will take care of thier own affairs. Bush basically held Iraq hostage.
2006-11-10 06:13:51 · answer #2 · answered by Zabanya 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
His incompetent mind wouldn't allow him to think about the slain Iraqi civilians, and I regretfully have to say no. All he has on his mind is nothing but greenbacks from his friends at the oil companies! That's all he cares about! It's profits before the Iraqi victims! And before long, he's going to be haunted by the victims of his quagmire!!!
2006-11-10 06:26:10 · answer #3 · answered by brian 2010 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That would be like 150,000 Mexican civilians dying because FDR attacked them in retaliation for Pearl Harbor.
2006-11-10 11:59:16 · answer #4 · answered by iknowtruthismine 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that you whiners who are always complaining about President Bush have to bear some of the responsibility for that total because the Jihadists think that we are a weak country due to all your constant devisiveness. You encourage them with every one of your whiney diatribes and they respond by trying to prove you right to force our troops to be pulled out. Maybe the killing will stop if you just shut up.
2006-11-10 06:15:56 · answer #5 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
bush nor cheney won't loose a bit of sleep over your sons and daughters deaths. there children will never have to go to war.they have used the american populas, and their hard earned tax dollars for there financial gain, and soon they'll be gone. its said history repeats its self.
2006-11-10 06:42:42 · answer #6 · answered by DASH 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The overwhelming vast majority of these deaths have been caused by MUSLIM INSURGENTS -- not by American or other coalitiion soldiers.
Of course, the biased, leftwing, anti-war media didn't tell you that. So it's not your fault for not knowing. But now you know.
2006-11-10 06:10:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
200,000 Kurds killed by Saddam, over 2 million killed in his war with Iran, thousands of Kuwaitis killed by Saddam in that Invasion. Are they on your do do anything that might cause you any inconvenience, little mind? Saddam tortured children to get make their parents suffer, tortured athletes for losing. But I guess that's OK as long as it is not happening to you, or you don't have to know about it!
2006-11-10 06:12:44 · answer #8 · answered by mark g 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
considering that the us shores have not been attacked since 911 by al qaeda primarily BECAUSE of reacting to the very real threat of jihad...WHY SHOULD HE my tree hugging friend?
2006-11-10 06:11:44 · answer #9 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I've got some prime real estate. I figure you're buying.
2006-11-10 06:15:03 · answer #10 · answered by kitty fresh & hissin' crew 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋