English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-11-09 21:10:56 · 16 answers · asked by Luke F 3 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

If you think i need medicatin then debate me on the issue and i will embarass you. After hundreds of attempts to this day no one has been able to step up to the plate.

2006-11-09 21:18:48 · update #1

dane, keep in mind the war games that were in place on 9/11

2006-11-09 21:24:22 · update #2

this issue does not have anything to do with conservatives or liberals, clearly you have not done any research, simple as that.

2006-11-09 21:47:09 · update #3

this issue does not have anything to do with conservatives or liberals, clearly you have not done any research, simple as that.

2006-11-09 21:47:23 · update #4

16 answers

Dubya's puppeteers policies are not new :-

“Naturally the common people don't want war; neither in Russia, nor in England, nor in America,

nor in Germany. That is understood. But after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine

policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or

a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the

people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is

to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and

exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
Hermann Göring(Nazi) 1946 Nuremberg Trials

The US. Government has lied about many wars. The increase of troops in Vietnam was based on an

attack in the Tonkin Gulf that never happened. Some say that Roosevelt knew about Pearl Harbor

and let it happen to get support to join World War Two. The Spanish-American War (Remember the

Maine!) was also based on a hoax.

Not to mention the numerous covert wars that they lied about. Iran-Contra, the overthrow of

Mossadegh in Iran, Allende in Chile, Arbenz in Guatemala. Also the war in Panama, against someone

who was on the payroll of the CIA. Cuba as well. The Bay of Pigs invasion was supported by the

CIA, and the people who invaded were trained by the CIA in Guatemala.

As for 9/11 this is the origin of the plan:-
"We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the

nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller: Statement to the Untied Nations Business Council in September 1994

"For more than a century, ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have

seized upon well-publicized incidents to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate

influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even

believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States,

characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with other around the

world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you

will. If that is the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it." David Rockefellers memoirs

(2002)

and this is what Dubya's puppeteers had to say in 2000;-
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be

a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor"
Project for the New American Century (2000)


Which brings into question 9/11/(2001), which was never investigated properly, and has been

hijacked in order to enact Dubya's agenda and the subsequent illegitimate wars.
The 9/11 documentary Loose Change 2nd edition is available free on Youtube:-

Part 1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGEb40o17yE&search=loose%20change%202nd%20edition

Part 2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOVWBQKUpsU&search=loose%20change%202nd%20edition

Part 3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtV1uxYnu0w&search=loose%20change%202nd%20edition

Decide for yourselves people ;)


I do agree with Dubya on one thing:-

"I think one way for us to end up being viewed as the ugly American is for us to go around the

world saying, "We do it this way. So should you."
"I think the United States must be humble and must be proud and confident of our values, but

humble in how we treat nations that are figuring out how to chart their own course."
George W. Bush - 2nd presidential debate Oct 11th 2000

2006-11-10 04:51:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Actually its thermate (with sulphur addition) and Professor Steven Jones has honestly proven metal samples from the towers, he certainly located thermate lines. The one essential factor he did factor out used to be 'yellow molten steel' flowing from the affect flooring. Its on the entire information pictures so theres no denying it occurred. Now the one fabric on this planet that may glide yellow in a liquid state is thermate (Im no scientist however I could presume its the sulfur that makes it seem yellow.) Now Ive noticeable the movies, so have hundreds of thousands of persons , so much with out realising what they had been watching at. But Steven Jones is an overly found out guy, he stories matters like this, and I consider what he has located is certain evidence of thermate slicing expenditures. If you consider Bush's tale or now not you have got to watch a unfastened to air doco referred to as "911 Mysteries" it presents up a large number of causes why 911 occurred how it did, so much if now not they all scarily plausible..... The movie maker Sofia Smallstorm can not inform you that it certainly used to be an within task, all she does is reward the tips and as soon as youve watched it you're going to begin considering....that a lot I can promise you. And yet another factor at the same time Im right here........the Bush apologists will consistently argue that the metal didnt have got to soften to purpose the flooring to break down, thats reasonable ample BUT. What they anticipate us to consider is that the help clips all failed on the affect flooring which triggered a pancake outcome correct??? Seems like a fair argument, even the legitimate record tells us the flooring pancaked. But there may be one essential flaw that they cant give an explanation for and Ill inform you what it's. For a flooring to pancake it has to fall by way of area to hit the ground underneath it, this breaks the helps preserving up the scale down flooring and many others (approximately eighty instances until the mass reaches floor degree.) now despite the fact that we supply each and every flooring an amazingly speedy part moment to journey by way of that area crushing the entire help metal, girders, metal mesh, internal partitions, workplace furnishings and many others, the truly global time for the affect flooring to arrive floor degree must had been round forty seconds!!! (thats eighty storeys collapsing in a part moment each and every!!!! That it appears that evidently didn't occur on account that THERE WAS NO PANCAKING!!!! The towers dropped inside 14 seconds, close to as speedy as freefal velocity!!! And the one manner that might have occurred used to be via severing the forty eight metal columns on the center, and more often than not severing the groundwork metal within the basements additionally, there is not any 2 approaches approximately it. The Bush apologists physics dont preserve as much as scrutiny, they dont preserve as much as crucial evaluation, and why such a lot of movies all over the place the online displaying survivors and firemen, police officers and newshounds all citing explosions within the constructions?

2016-09-01 10:17:25 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

This has always been of interest to me and I have read and followed most of the reports, papers, articles, etc. regarding the terrorists actions and training leading to the attack; the conjectures about how the buildings collapsed, the weakening of the structures due to the heat of the fuel burning, etc.

Much of it is still conjecture and opinion - no definite proof, no smoking gun, not a shred of positive evidence that it was an inside job. Facts themselves can be sometimes misleading - interpretation and opinion can be even more misleading.

2006-11-09 21:59:25 · answer #3 · answered by 63vette 7 · 0 0

the majority is always easily fooled. We know the truth, its not even a Bush thing or a republican thing, it goes way deeper. We can't ignore it, but what can we do? At least we now know the type of people we are dealing with, people that can do whatever they want. They have so much money and power they can fool the masses. All we can do is hope righteousness will prevail.

2006-11-09 21:30:32 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

The only issue I have is, that why the planes weren't detected changing course- I mean, all airplane traffic is under surveillance all the time!
It was either a gross-negligence or a misunderstanding.

2006-11-09 21:22:15 · answer #5 · answered by dane 4 · 0 0

The Democrats won because they spread the news that 9/11 was made by Republicans and people believed them.

2006-11-09 21:14:55 · answer #6 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1 1

It may or may not have been ,but at least I'm willing to listen to both sides witch,both sides have valid arguments & we will never know unless we stop name calling and do our american duty & research it.Don't be close minded and base your facts on what billy said ,or what cnn said ,get up & out & research

2006-11-09 21:25:48 · answer #7 · answered by bradship4u 3 · 1 0

They have medication for that, you know. You might be able to get some cheap up in Canada. Or Tijuana.

2006-11-09 21:16:09 · answer #8 · answered by Lilywhite 2 · 1 0

Fact?

2006-11-09 21:12:34 · answer #9 · answered by tumbleweed1954 6 · 0 0

By embracing reality and cleaning your system out with a detox.

2006-11-09 21:20:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers