could only be allowed during rape & incest cases? I, myself am pro choice but I knew someone I went to high school with that had 4 in 2 years & I think that's disgusting. I think she abused her right to choose by not using birth control. Is there a middle ground?
2006-11-09 17:59:50 · 6 answers · asked by gitsliveon24 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Yeah you know what I completely agree with you there, it's a good system but there are people (like in every system) who abuse it. I don't know about making it illegal but maybe establishing some sort of system...like social security cards, only 6 in a lifetime or something. I mean if you're dumb enough to KEEP getting yourself knocked up then you diserve to have that baby so you know you can't always get out of it that easy. And yes I am pro choice but people like that drive me up the wall.
2006-11-09 18:03:23 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Four abortions in 2 years does seem a bit ridiculous. There could be some serious damage done to the uterine lining if she continues at that rate, not to mention the risk of getting diseases along the way (assuming multiple partners, which may not be correct). She obviously has a problem. Now-a-days, you can get implanted contraception, which lasts for 3 years, so there is no excuse for forgetting, and it is morally much more acceptable than abortion.
Education helps, but there is an objection that being educated somehow might cause women to become promiscuous.
There is middle ground, if people are not too stubborn to see it and go there. Clearly educating men will not help as much; they are not the ones left holding the baby, or having the abortion. The better educated the girl as she enters adolescence, the more likely they will know how to prevent unwanted pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. They might also learn how to spot any deceptively sly-voiced adolescent male who is after just one thing.
Praying won't help.
Hope is not a contraceptive device.
2006-11-10 02:20:02 · answer #2 · answered by Labsci 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
yeah I would agree with ou on the 4 and 2 thing
their should be a way to restrict people who cannot afford to take care of children from having them. They should not become a burden to society with the mother getting off scott free.
as for an Abortion law the most you might have is the supreme court saying its up to states and their will be always states with abortion practices.
2006-11-10 02:03:45 · answer #3 · answered by Gamla Joe 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Of course there is. And most people are somewhere in the middle. It is likely that when that irl tries to concieve she will have problems. The important thing is to know what is right for our own bodies and situations and not to judge others, even if they do things we see as wrong.
2006-11-10 02:03:47 · answer #4 · answered by maggie_at0303 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Your opinion on what she should do is none of her business. She didn't have sex with herself by the way, her partner had a choice of wearing a condom too so try not to cover up your pro choice bullshit when you have no respect for the rights and choice of others.
2006-11-10 02:02:59 · answer #5 · answered by Craiova 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
that woman should have her tubes tied!!!
if she cant afford birth control, what makes her think shell be able to afford multiple abortions?!?!
dispicable!
but yes, eventually i think a law will be passed stating what you said, or just plain flat out allowing it to whoever wishes within the first trimester.
2006-11-10 02:02:36 · answer #6 · answered by WiseWisher 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋