formaor iraqi president or u can say dictetor
2006-11-09 14:32:21 · 12 answers · asked by Amber J 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Absolutely NOT....He's done no worse than most of the other world leaders. To believe otherwise is just kidding yourself.
He had the people there under control. Look at how hard it is to do that.....Look at the type of people who we're dealing with there now.....Harsh conditions require harsh controls.
Saddaam should walk!
2006-11-09 14:39:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hanged till death? As opposed to what? Hanged till, oh, I don't know, really uncomfortable?
I don't think Saddam should be hanged at all. I think he should be let loose - into an arena filled with the survivors of his murderous regime.
Come on, be serious - who is gonna say he shouldn't die, hopefully a horrible and painful death, for his heinous crimes against humanity? I'm thinking even his "defense" attorneys are privately relieved to see this outcome. And I don't think you'll be hearing too much from the christians on this one, either. They're too busy stirring up the muck over on the "Religion & Spirituality" boards, anyway.
Praise be to ____________ (fill in the blank with the god or goddess of your choice)!
2006-11-09 15:21:27 · answer #2 · answered by happy heathen 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was found guilty of crimes against humanity. Specifically, his own people. His punishment has been decreed and MUST be carried out. Other pip-squeek dictators need to understand that in time, there will be a reckoning. Seeing Saddam hanging from a pole might give other bad people with bad ideas a pause.
2006-11-09 14:43:42 · answer #3 · answered by Appollyon 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
NO. He does no longer have had this destiny if he had bootlicked the individuals.maximum countries ruled by potential of monarchy will safeguard coupe tries with ruthless rigidity. After Saddam’s removing if we are to get admission to the placement in Iraq it does make extra experience to appreciate why Saddam ruled Iraq with iron fists. Iraqis have been extra useful off below Saddam than they're as we talk below the so stated as American subsidized govt. it somewhat is extremely unlucky and disgusting to be conscious approximately human beings like Bush, Blair walk loose whilst they could be tried below the worldwide terrorism act for his or her movements that's at as quickly as in charge for the deaths of hundreds international over. it somewhat is a pity and shame on the persons of usa for having elected a president like BUSH. His movements have basically added extra gas to the already deteriorated perspectives quite of the persons in midsection East. existence is almost a wheel what is going around comes lower back at you. regulation of Karma says certainly everyone will pay for his or her deeds and this is going for human beings like Bush & Blair as properly.
2016-12-10 06:14:51 · answer #4 · answered by cheng 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not yet - I say we ask him to write a book first. CHapters can include
a) Where he hid the WMD
b) His dealings with the CIA before he all of a sudden became a 'bad guy'
(Remember the photo with RUmsfield)
c) Why Bush the Elder didn't kill him in the first World War
and so much more!
2006-11-09 15:03:19 · answer #5 · answered by rasmalai001 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ithink hanging is cruel and unusual punishment
2006-11-09 17:59:31 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lethal Injection shoould be good enough. Just send him to God to be judged.
2006-11-12 15:53:57 · answer #7 · answered by Gary M 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no... because if we hang him, the iraguis that support him will come after us for killing their former leader... but we should capture him at least... for the safety of the country i think..
2006-11-09 14:48:18 · answer #8 · answered by Melanie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes because that the sentence after he is found guilty of crimes against humanity.
2006-11-09 14:35:10 · answer #9 · answered by livinhapi 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, we dont want to set a precident here
2006-11-09 17:22:45 · answer #10 · answered by thevillageidiotxx 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋