I can't believe how many answerers didn't get it. I got it. It's another example of the 'forced' liberalism causing lost work. Just like what could be the safest and most productive oil fields, isn't even started on, because of the liberal environmentalists. I worked in that industry for a while, needless to say, I don't anymore.
2006-11-09 14:31:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I believe that second-hand smoke can kill. There are too many toxins in cigarettes, and it can cause cancer and asthma to those around you if you live with someone or people who smoke. Saying that, I also believe they shouldn't take smoking away from bars and nightclubs. These businesses thrive on selling alcohol, and there are a lot of people who smoke when they drink. In a restaurant, I don't need your smoke. In a bar or nightclub, you make that decision whether or not you want to go into a smoke-filled area that sells alcohol.
2006-11-09 14:23:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by linus_van_pelt68 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hey, I'm a Democrat and don't think the smoking bans are right simply because it should be a business decision. There are plenty of places that are already non-smoking-business owners that cater to non-smoking clients. It should be the owner's choice. And Republicans are on board with the smoking bans too.
2006-11-09 14:58:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Middleclassandnotquiet 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
SMOKER-PUFF AWAY AT THE CANCER INSTITUTION.
JUNK SCIENCE..
COME TO LUMBERTON NORTH CAROLINA.
EXIT 17. CANCER INSTITUTION.
I WILL SHOW YOU REALITY OF SECOND HAND SMOKE ON CHILDREN AGES 1 TO ADULTS THRU 100+.
NUMBER ONE CAUSE FOR ADMITTANCE-IN REST AND NURSING HOMES --SMOKING---
JUNK..
JUNK IS TRYING TO TAKE ONE MORE BREATH--ALL BECAUSE OTHER MEMBERS OF FAMILY SMOKED AND ALL YOU DID WAS INHALE THEIR POLUTTED TRASH .
KILL YOURSELF-SUICIDE IS ALSO ILLEGAL..
BUT DON'T TAKE CHILDREN AND INNOCENT PEOPLE WITH YOU.
EVER DOLLAR SPENT ON TOBACCO--7 DOLLARS IS SPENT ON HEALTH CARE--
WE NON SMOKERS ARE PAYING TAXES SO YOU CAN KILL YOURSELF AND OTHERS AND FRIEND-I DON'T LIKE THAT ONE DIMES WORTH.
BAN SMOKING IN ANY PUBLIC BUILDING OR SALES AREA OR TRANPORTATION VEHICLES OR TRANSPORT AREA
OR CITY, COUNTY, MUNCIPAL, OR STATE OR FED LANDS.
THANK YOU.
2006-11-09 14:29:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by cork 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Huh? What?
What state did this happen in?
There is a smoking ban in Cali, has been for a long time, but it doesn't mean you can't work somewhere if you smoke. You just have to go outside to do it.
2006-11-09 14:20:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by BigTip$ 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Well, they can't smoke inside the building but they can go out for a smoke outside...no law against that. Call the Labor Board.
2006-11-09 14:21:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No through fact nutrition--beverages-Alcohol are all risky . yet i might desire to declare smoking is risky to non human beings who smoke..and those i discussed merely harm that distinctive , the place is our Freedom of selection going to , in the event that they like to banned smoking the government and the cigarette employer might could report bankrupt.. its on no account going to take place while they take income human beings human beings who smoke. ..as far through fact the contraband products they on no account helped me.. that is merely yet in a various way for that employer to make money additionally . think of approximately it..the ingredients we consume are inflicting youthful toddlers to mature speedier through fact of all the stuff put in nutrition . i considered a instruct approximately it and now it makes sence as to why 10--11-12-twelve months olds are so mature phycially. it cant be good the two .
2016-11-23 13:34:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Drinkers and smokers bring in more money than eaters.
2006-11-09 14:23:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
junk science on 2nd hand smoke?
you must be 15 and sneaking cigs to even think that.
2006-11-09 14:18:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
this is outrageous i can't believe people are getting fired for being smokers
2006-11-09 14:18:10
·
answer #10
·
answered by Robyn T 4
·
1⤊
1⤋