I would never want it to be a tourny like b.ball, but I would be for the plus one idea..Number 1 play #3, #2 play #4, winners go to the nat chanmpionship..
2006-11-09 13:49:44 · 22 answers · asked by BAARAAACK 5 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Bubba,Auburn screws themselves because Tommy Dumervile never plays anyone in non conference play.Only weak boarder line jr colleges he plays outside of the conference. Thats how OU, Texas,OSU,USC,makes it in and Auburn gets left out..Those teams usualy plays at least 2 good ranked teams in non conference play,while Tommy is busy with Lousiana Lafyatte and Central Arkansas,..No one will get to the title game with games like that..
2006-11-10 14:41:27 · update #1
I am for a playoff system. I think it hurts the sport when their is a tie for the national championship. There should be a way to show at the end of the season who is truly the best.There have been many match ups like Michigan/Nebraska and many more that never took place and have left speculation as the only answers that we will ever get. I don't think it should be like March Madness, but it would be something special if the top ten schools were in a playoff.
2006-11-09 17:55:39 · answer #1 · answered by hawkeye316 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's really for the money that the schools get for playing and winning the game. Also for the fans and players to go somewhere and spend money in that city ( unless of course your like Vanderbuilt playing in your own state. Go Commodoors by the way!) Also Utah better be number 2 the way they whooped on an Alabama team that didn't show. (I'm a bama fan and was there. :-/ ) I believe that there are still a lot of problems with some conferences not having a conference championship(pac 10, MAC for example) and some schools choose a conference to get into, (Notre Dame) there wouldn't be that much trouble with the BCS. but as it stands the BCS is bull because if you look at Georgia before losing to Alabama they were undefeated and kept dropping in the polls. That's the kind of thing that is bull. I'm am SEC supporter, (except Auburn and Florida with Tim Tebow) but I argued that Utah should have been in the National Championship without a doubt. I believe that is exactly what the BCS is doing( Ranking and comparing teams by strength of schedule(flawed) and helps out the media darlings)
2016-03-28 00:56:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm for it.
Obviously not the 65 team tourny that basketball uses, but I see nothing wrong with a 16 team playoff.
Make the first round the weekend that the conference championship games are played. Played at the homefield of the higher seed.
Make the quater-finals 2 on xmas eve and 2 on xmas day at a nuetral site.
The semi-finals on New Years day at a nuetral site.
and the Championship game the Sunday between the NFL Conference Championship games and the Superbowl at a neutral site.
2006-11-09 14:02:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am all for it! The BCS is a bunch of bunk. Of course the season would have to start either earlier, or end later. I think a 16 team tournament is a reasonable idea, all conference champions (I think there are 11 conf.) and five wild cards (5 best teams that are good but didn't win their conference). That would be more exciting having all conference champions with the rest of the nation's best competing for the national title, rather than just 2 teams projected by a bunch of computers. I'd be hooked just like March Madness!
2006-11-09 15:19:00 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm for it as well.
I think they should have all the major conference champs (plus a few wild cards to make it an even number) in the playoff. So basically, the conference championship game would be the first round of the playoffs. Require each conference to have a championship game if they do not now. It would be awesome. Ratings would be great and the universities would make a killing.
Alas, chances of it happening are about as good as Rutgers in the national championship game!
;)
2006-11-09 17:36:42 · answer #5 · answered by Flip 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would be for a 8 team tournament. especially this year when there will probably only be 1 undefeated team at the end of the season with a whole bunch of 1-loss teams. This year's BCS is turning out to be in serious trouble.
2006-11-09 14:10:21 · answer #6 · answered by mesquitemachine 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I say have one after the bcs bowls, lets have them play until the end of february, more college football is a good thing
2006-11-09 16:15:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that I would be better if there would be 8 teams in a play off.
2006-11-09 15:20:17 · answer #8 · answered by Jazzy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
against it, they could have a bad day orz miss a game they should have a chance to redeem themselves in a playoff braket instead of just puttin them anywere sgsinst someone wit less skill then them and they end up killin them
2006-11-09 17:50:55 · answer #9 · answered by Get Real 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would love it. But i think it should be more than the top four teams. The top 12. That would be nice.
2006-11-09 14:04:26 · answer #10 · answered by Aimee 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋