Democrats have called for a withdrawal of troops-are we now going to lose?

Question

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061110/ap_on_el_ge/eln_democrats_iraq

Are Democrats are going to make us lose the war now? Are insurgents emboldened by today's news? Will there be a spike in violence now?

Answer 1

Its all over but the crying.

Answer 2

This is a lost war no matter who is in power. The military in Iraq has always been fighting a losing battle. That's why they're still there.

As long as a Muslim lives they will seek revenge and no country can kill all of them. They are all over the world, in places the American media does not publish.

BTW: Iraq was never trying to convert America, they did not have WDMs, nor were they involved in 9/11.

Bush had no reason to attack those people. He made up the reasons I mentioned above and even more. And he repeated it so often that those who support him repeated verbatim

Did anyone say '1984'

Answer 3

Depends on your concept of "losing the war". According to the President, victory was declared nearly two years ago, in Iraq. Terrorists aren't only from one or two countries. The are all over the war. The war in Iraq is supposedly over. I say 'supposedly' because our troops are still being sent there. They're talking about sending more in the next two years! it's hardly to say the war is over with the fall of one country. We've got a long way to go before we can say with a fair amount of certainty that we have won the war.

Answer 4

who's that this us and we??? I listen that a lot and individuals utilizing us and we as political bartering device. This sickens me. after I recieved my orders for standeby and reactivation. the position replaced into the U. S. and we then? i'm a mom and that i might want to favor to make sure my childrens improve prevalent. yet even as such a good number of comprise sitting at residing house observing thier television putting forward that this misquided "we" favor to stay over there you should understand some issues. this isn't a interest the following. this isn't a football interest the position you may say we received because someone ran a landing. everybody is death. moms, fathers, sons, daughters, and better halves and husbands. we are the we. And we favor to go back from over there and enable those genuine people hug thier kinfolk and flow to mattress without bullets over thier head and bodies at thier feet. I went over there with the daddy bush, and may ought to flow again with the son. So tell me, the position is this we even as those variety of households ought to hearken to about the losses. that is ridiculous. Screw the political activities and shall we commence questioning about those very genuine people!!

Answer 5

To lose what? We should not have gone into that war in the first place. We got them free from their president Saddam, we gave them weapons, we trained their police, they can fight for them selves. Our boys have to come home with 2 legs and 2 arms. Spike in the violence? If we leave,they are not killing us. They are killing each other. We should be happy, no?

Answer 6

1. That's not what it says.
2. If we boogie out in the next six months, we will concede defeat to a band of terrorists. We will become more open to their threats and attacks.
3. Dems have no clue what to do right now. If we exit early, we are paper tigers. If we stay, they will be liars to the liberals who voted them in. They couldn't give a plan for they have none. This is the change America voted for? The uncertainty of the future?
Dems are in a sticky situation, with nay a view to get out.

Answer 7

The democrats are going to call for the Iraqi's to take more responsibility for their country. Personally, I think it will be chaos over there no matter what we do, and we need to quit worrying about the Mexicans, and start watching our ports and airfields using our soldiers rather than $6.00/ hour workers. (no offense intended to those workers, but it's a bigger job now.)

Answer 8

the dems have not made us loose the war. the dems will pull our troops out and shortly in the time between - the insurgents will be coming here. now the war will continue - on our own soil.

God bless the country and all freedom loving American's now.

Answer 9

No, focus will be on assignment of people with real power to provide ownership of business to Iraq's economy-don't forget 500 billion Iraqi Dinar was stolen from the Central Bank of Iraq. Who better to run the economy than those with the gun power to protect and keep their interests, and provide themsleves with an outlet to funnel bad money into good?? Most terrorists are poor. Most criminals are poor. Why do you think there is so very little crime (street punk type criminals) on the streeets of Vegas, when the opportunity provides for so much? (The real powers that be want people to keep coming to their places, move them along, peacefully, or not, so they move the little element along. Also, finally, Baath Sunni's were, and are right now again,(no religious change necessary, thanks-except for the punishment factor) are being re-introduced back into city jobs in LARGE numbers. (How many years was Saddam in control?-adjustment takes time)-if you are an olympic athlete who is so mentally impregnated by a way of life, and expectation-if things change, if you're injured, lose, etc-you typically get psychiatric help-ANY big change is very stressful-PERIOD (It's how our brain works) New system in place. More distribution of wealth, more people with jobs, less demand for help by the people from the government, more demand from the masses to have things that all people with freedoms enjoy-like potable water for one-which relates to infrastructure, which is also in the planning and working stages, and creates jobs, and circulation of money, and more jobs, etc. Freedom for the people of Iraq!!! And if you believe otherwise, you are ignorant to fact, life and economics. No true course in "change" of action will take place with dems in office other than what I described above (and much, much more-and all good) which was always all in the game plan anyways. But, it was hard to determine who would demand what, who would demand most control, and from where, and how many just flat-out nut-jobs there would be to try and conflict with the progress everyone wanted anyways, regardless of religion. (noone is psychic) Yes, GREAT prosperity in Iraq is about 5 to 10 years away my friends. And also, whether you believe it or not, peace as well, in the whole region-even if someone has to take a political or 7.62 round, or worse, spanking to achieve this "humane behavior and lifestyle for all" There have been ALOT of people for MANY years in the government to thank to get this ball a rollin' too, but it just so happens that George W. Bush was the only one who didn't care about peoples opinions, or polls, to get this done, and step up to the plate and stop all of the nonsense like terrorism, which was mainly caused by oppression and Dictatorships, and different idiot factors who wanted ALL of the control, and lack of distribution of wealth that CAUSES people to act this way, just to have more. And if you think terrorism got worse since we went into Iraq, you have got a HELL of alot of learning and reading to do. Wake up, even if it takes a little smackdown to get it done, we are VERY close to a world-wide reality of government, and it has been LONG overdue!!!!!!! GOD BLESS AMERICA!!!! GOD BLESS GEORGE W. BUSH!!!!

Answer 10

The war powers act was passed in the early 70's.

Answer 11

Are democrats going to make us lose the war?

I'm not even gonna answer that, you're a fool.