2006-11-09 12:20:56 · 7 answers · asked by second born 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Civil war.
2006-11-09 12:23:16 · answer #1 · answered by Frank R 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, I asssume you are asking this because you have already figured out what will happen now that there is not a tie, and are now using the idle time on your hands for speculation (is that why they call it idle speculation?). I'd love to tell you, but I am still stuck in the present. Maybe if you could fill in the details of the reality for us, we could join you in the hypothetical - actually not even hypothetical, since it is now not even a possibility. Why am I spending so much time even responding then? Enough, already.
2006-11-09 12:27:41 · answer #2 · answered by JustaThought 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe there's ever been a tie in a single Senate race, but in lower-level races where there really is a tie (after recounts have played themselves out) is a coin-flip determines the winner.
2006-11-09 12:23:17 · answer #3 · answered by someone 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There would be a re-count that could be requested by either candidate if the difference separating the two candidates was less than 1%.
2006-11-09 12:27:18 · answer #4 · answered by Ed A 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Still a huge sweep and a more balanced process.
2006-11-09 12:23:30 · answer #5 · answered by soulsearcher 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there would be recount and recount costing mega bucks.
2006-11-09 12:22:19 · answer #6 · answered by godoompah 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
RECOUNT....
2006-11-09 12:27:53 · answer #7 · answered by cork 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋