Cindy Sheehan or Michael Moore?
2006-11-09 12:03:01 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Well, that used women, Sheehan, and Michael Moore, are useful as long as they can slander Republicans. Since Democrats have regained control, I suspect you will hear a lot less of these two. Unless there is a opportunity to slander, for political gain.
2006-11-09 12:22:42 · answer #1 · answered by zzz 2 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Look towards their more moderate candidates, there are a lot of Governors to choose from. Michigan's governor, Granholm, is an up and comer in thier party, expecially if her sucess resurrecting Michigan's economy continues in the right direction. She'd make a solid candidate but is relatively new to the game.
Also, remember it's rare for a northern liberal to win the presidency, and even more rare for a senator to do it, the only one who had both of those qualities was JFK. There is no current member of the party with his qualities.
2006-11-09 12:11:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I truly hope that the Democrats would consider JOHN EDWARDS,considering that I grew up during the John Kennedy era he reminds me of JFK, and he is young and cares about the American people first and all that other Bulls**##@!, second. He is definitely not JFK but we could use some young blood in the White House that doesn't think that we are all a bunch of John Wayne's ready to go to war.
2006-11-09 12:23:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I prefer Dennis Kucinich..one of the most principled people I ever met with great intelligence, compassion, and insight.
If it was between the two you mention, Michael Moore if he'd run. He is a very intelligent man, high IQ and with a lot of insight and a sense of humor..I personally really like Moore..he thinks like a green and I like the greens except for being prolife personally. I admire his creativity, way at getting his message across, and high moral fiber. I really appreciate his activism.
2006-11-09 13:26:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
It doesn't make any difference, because when you people who supported Bush and will stay the course with support for Foley or Haggard or Foulwall, well, we could have Alfred E Neuman as a candidate and easily win.
2006-11-09 12:11:12 · answer #5 · answered by commonsense 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I am a proud progressive Liberal Democrat, and I will throw you defeated dogs this bone for solace: Whoever they pick will lose, 99% certainty, because they always take the coffee house/dance club/freak lunatic fringe into account at their conventions, and forget the hard-working union stiff which made the party powerful.
2006-11-09 12:09:09 · answer #6 · answered by martino 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Gore could be my first determination additionally, yet we ought to push him to leap into the race. there is one incorrect way. Gore ought to be drafted on the convention if no Candidate wins the Nomination on the 1st poll. i think of the later is possible, even though it could be extra effective to get Gore in as quickly as possible.
2016-12-14 04:34:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gore / Obama 08.
2006-11-09 12:14:03 · answer #8 · answered by here to help 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
More like Hillary or Obama
2006-11-09 12:10:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I like Edwards... just me... the only thing people yell is "trial lawyer" at him... but it doesn't really seem to stick...
who will the Republicans run? Pat Roberts or Jerry Fallwell?
2006-11-09 12:08:00 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋