Upset with Ebays new Tactics, pulling listings? Have you had this happen?

Question

I am an Ebay seller (3 yrs). Ebay has a policy to pull listings if S&H is too high compared to starting price. I had four intimates listed at 99 cents with $6.50 S&H and they were pulled. Said I was circumventing fees (not allowing them to get money off the listing price.

They have encouraged SELLERS to list low pushing the 99 cent deal. Sellers can not recoup losses if the S&H does not cover the fees and shipping. It is a no win situation.

Any woman would die to get lingerie for a total or $7.00. I cant belive how little I been selling new items for. List at 99 cents and they sell for 99cents.

Any other buyers having problems with new policies?

Answer 1

I don't have a problem with this. Ebay has had many, many complaints about people quoting shipping at $6.50 and then, upon receiving the package, seeing it only cost $0.90 to ship it EVEN IF IS CLEARLY DEFINED IN THE AD!

Adding the cost of the packaging to the price is acceptable, but dropping your price to only make up for it in the shipping price is not good business. It doesn't matter if Ebay is pushing it, you are still selling below your cost.

It's all about perception. An item that sells for 99 cents is not going to be viewed as expensive, but $6.50 for shipping is. If you sell it for $4.99 and post real shipping AND handling costs, even if the item cost you $1.99, you make your profit. The customer doesn't know how much you paid for the item, only what they paid for it. They perceived it was worth more than $4.99 and still got a good deal. But the way you have it listed indicates you are trying to profit from the shipping. Again, this is perceived as you are ripping them off, not the small total amount they paid.

Answer 2

the authentic difficulty is that you're utilizing somebody else's popularity and popularity, and reckoning on the artwork, their likeness, to make funds -- that is common as invasion of privateness or appropriation of likeness, a civil incorrect (also common as a tort) in case you had Abraham Lincoln t-shirts, or Ronald Reagan t-shirts, those might want to be ok so long because the image on the blouse wasn't copyrighted by anybody else. why?? there's no invasion of privateness and appropriation of likeness even as applies to deceased persons. If ebay leaves your FF merchandise on the area, they grow to be concern to being sued for invasion of privateness because they're contained in the chain of commerce and can want to really be found, in court, to have common or "likely" common that your textile replaced into not explicitly licensed by FF. And if FF's people sue, who're they going after - you, a unmarried broking service, or Ebay, a company with deep wallet??? (ebay might want to then turn round and sue you for indemnification, if FF were given a judgment adverse to them) Your putting forward "custom" on your listings has not something to do with it. that isn't any legal protection in any respect in favour of you or for Ebay. in the journey that your itemizing reported "formally licensed" then they'd go away you on my own except someone complained because you despatched them something lower than the guise of formally licensed, and it became out to not be formally licensed. i am going to go away it at this - give up promoting the stuff or get smarter about your listings.

Answer 3

Yes I am ready to start a petition on the new policies and possible summonings them to appear in court over this.