I'm working on a term paper and it says to
'Explain whether both characters in the novel are equally developed.'
what does this mean??
2006-11-09 09:53:24 · 6 answers · asked by Danielle 4 in Education & Reference ➔ Homework Help
A developed character is typically one that has a past, human qualities (meaning it can not be a flat character--i.e. a character who is just funny, or just angry) it has to be a rounded individual. If you are comparing the development of two characters search for gaps in a particular character. Is one missing the history of a fully developed character? I am not sure which text you are examining, but their is usually one character who is more developed than the other. Hopefully this helps a bit.
2006-11-09 10:03:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only way I can think of to explain this is to think of a building. Bld a is up to code, has all the bells and whistles, is a complete work. Bldg b, needs plumbing, and isn't as impressive as a.
First character could be the most important, a lot of time was spent w/ descriptives, roles, and attributes. Mayber the second is more of a bit player, doesn't have much to say or lacks the personality and appeal of the first.
2006-11-09 10:02:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are asking in the book you are reading if both of the characters , I'm assuming you know which ones they are talking about (but otherwise I'm guessing the 2 main) , are well made, vivid, have their own personalities. You will be able to set them apart from the other ones.
I really hope this helped you
2006-11-09 10:21:58 · answer #3 · answered by silverboy470 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe it means, did the author go into enough depth about who the characters are and what they stand for? Do you know as much about each of the characters or does one still have some mysteries surrounding them?
2006-11-09 10:03:59 · answer #4 · answered by catwoman 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are asking if both characters have been clearly described equally.
2006-11-09 10:01:50 · answer #5 · answered by dt_05851 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope... i'd desire to be incorrect of course, yet... i think of not even a single observe in that sentence is previous English. ================== OH, BLA-BLA HOW 'exciting" PROPS TO YOU FOR POSTING something "exciting" " "long" is an adjective; the noun bearing directly to that's "length." yet "weight" isn't an adjective. "Heavy" and "mild" are adjectives, and the noun bearing directly to that's "weight." So we already have a noun for the belief of "the quantity of stress exerted on an merchandise by ability of gravity," and that observe is "weight." superb DOES ANY OF YOU LOSERS EVEN comprehend WHAT THE term "previous ENGLISH" truthfully ability? I quite desire certainly one of YOU gets "appropriate answer", and that i FRIKKIN desire THE ASKER FAILZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
2016-10-21 13:38:55 · answer #6 · answered by wach 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋