English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Who would be a good candidate to succeed him to begin to repair the immense damage that he has done both in America, and the
world?

2006-11-09 08:47:04 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

For all the people giving thumbs down, you must be more stupid than he is.

2006-11-10 10:19:00 · update #1

26 answers

Yes Bush is very bad, sure Nixon was involved in planning a robbery, but both of these men are not the worst. Andrew Jackson was the worst President in our history, after all his policy of genoside against the American Indians solidifies his standing as the worst. Of modern Presidents Humphrey did enable the Great Depression, sure his conservative fiscal policy plunged the world into a depression, but you still think Bush is the worst!

I am a hard line liberal, I can't stand Bush, but I will give him credit for not being the worst of all time, the worst in the last 70 years, still no thanks to trick Dick. So Bush gets forth worst over all. You never know, we could get stuck with Pataki, who just might do nothing at all and lull the country to death.

2006-11-09 09:00:01 · answer #1 · answered by vertical732 4 · 1 4

My own personal question... How many of you know the names of all 43 presidents and at least one thing they all did?

Anyway, there needs to be a democrat to compliment the Congress. They are going to be there for a while. I want to say Barack Obama but he is a little too new to the Hill (maybe the term after?). I think that we need a woman to straighten out this country. In that case, the only person that comes to mind is Hillary R. Clinton.

Sen. Clinton is a very respectable person, not too moderate but not too liberal either. Plus, she was a dynamic stateswoman as the First Lady. Just think of what she could do as president! The U.S. needs that now.

2006-11-09 17:26:49 · answer #2 · answered by Sensible_5 2 · 0 1

Bush arrived with an unimpressive resume, a meandering unfocused personal life that hides under still Presidential Exec.Order to be kept secret for 80 years. Bush's past is unworthy and his Presidency has many aspects he wants kept under wraps. So whether Bush has done well or worse is unknown. He wanted it this way. Besides, Bush wasn't suppose to become US President in 2000. Al Gore got thousands more votes. He was Selected by 5 Supreme Court judges who allowed him to live rent free in the WH ever since. Like juiced up MLBasebal records Bush's will have an asterisk next to his name in the Guiness Book of World Records 100 years from now!

2006-11-09 17:14:18 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 3

Actually, I bet in 50 years, he'll be considered one of the greatest! History is on my side too. History tends to speak well and favor 2 term presidents. Of course, that means history will look at Slick Willy Clinton favorably too, but the facts are the facts.

2006-11-09 16:50:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 6 1

No he won't. The economy is good, we've stopped being attacked on our own soil, unemployment is low, etc.

JImmy Carter escalated extremist hatred of the US with his Middle East policies and mortgages were being written with interest rates of 28%. That energy crisis was fun too. I'd vote him as the winner/loser.

2006-11-10 11:03:13 · answer #5 · answered by RAR24 4 · 2 0

I wouldn't neccesarily count on that...much of that hinges on what becomes of Iraq over the next 20 years.
Current popularity is meaningless....perhaps the greatest President in history was also one of the MOST unpopular in his time...ABRAHAM LINCOLN. Think we have a divided country NOW???

2006-11-09 16:51:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 7 0

I'd say Arnold Shwarzeneger we wouldn't even need and army, didn't anybody see commando or any of the terminator movies Arnold could take out terrorism with one punch. And Sly Stallone would be a great secretary of state.

2006-11-09 16:52:33 · answer #7 · answered by bob john 1 · 0 2

Dumbya is the best, worst and ONLY dictator the USA ever had... so far. The worst ELECTED president was Nixon who also had dictatorial tendencies. I will settle for an transparently HONEST election which SHOULD be your focus at this time and not on personalities.

2006-11-09 16:58:02 · answer #8 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 0 3

George W. Bush will go down in history as a precursor of the Anti-Christ!
George W. Bush is the 6th King in Rev. 17:10 who is spoken of in the present tense! Because when he was in office in 2001 there were 5-x presidents who were still alive, and one is yet to come, was Obama!

The angel Gabriel told me that Jimmy Carter is the Anti-Christ and that he is going to change his name and divorce his wife!
Obama is going to die first and then the Anti-Christ who was one of the previous 7 Presidents will take his place!

Rev. 17:10 And there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, [and] the other is not yet come; and when he cometh, he must continue a short space.
These 7 kings were;
1. Gerald Ford
2. Jimmy Carter
3. Ronald Reagan
4. George H. W. Bush
5. Bill Clinton

6. George W. Bush.... is spoken of in the present tense (and one is) because until Reagan died all 7 were alive!

7. Barack Obama.......and one is yet to come! He will die a few days after he raises taxes!
Obama is also in Dan. 11:20
Then shall stand up in his estate a raiser of taxes [in] the glory of the kingdom: but within few days he shall be destroyed, neither in anger, nor in battle.
Rev. 17:11 And the beast that was, and is not, even he is the eighth, and is of the seven, and goeth into perdition.

The angel Gabriel told me in Aug. 1973 that Jimmy Carter was the Anti-Christ and that he is going to change his name and divorce his wife!

Obama is going to die first, and then the Anti-Christ, who was one of the previous 7 Presidents will take his place!

2014-07-19 16:28:16 · answer #9 · answered by Jim 7 · 1 0

History will put him in the top 25% of Presidents. His biggest failing was alienating the press, either because of aloofness, hubris, or just a lack of vision.

If he had endeaered himself to the media, or had a press secretary with personality he would have avoided many of the media-driven issues.

2006-11-09 16:58:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 5 3

fedest.com, questions and answers