4) In 1936, the government of the Soviet Union issued a document which said, in part, "the Communist Party...boldy defends the interest of workers and peasants to the very end." Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Write an essay using at least two specific details from your reading to support your opinion. Focus your essay on events which happened in the first 15 years of Soviet rule (1919-1935). Note: the essay should be only two or three paragraphs long, each paragraph is 2-5 sentences.
2006-11-09 08:35:29 · 5 answers · asked by Lion 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
You little liar. This is homework, and you won't develop valuable research skills if others do it for you.
2006-11-09 10:13:13 · answer #1 · answered by Dunrobin 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
well i do believe that communist party does have the best interest in the working people but it has never been implemented.
why i believe it's true, the idea of the communist economy is that every person is guaranteed a job. nobody is better than anybody else so there is really reason for competition. i mean if everybody makes the same cash why would you try to get a promotion? the idea of universal health care was a big part in communist society.
why it never works, well everybody is guaranteed a job but the problem is more than likely you force employers to hire more people than needed. if a company has 30 people and only 10 people actually work while the other 20 just sits around, you're wasting man power and you're forced to increase prices to pay the extra workers. if everybody gets paid the same and nobody really bothers with trying to get promotions well why bother working so hard?
the idea of the communist party was to over throw the Czar so Russia can feed it's people. i do believe that the statement is true, but it has never been really used effectively.
2006-11-09 08:46:49 · answer #2 · answered by gets flamed 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The only interest shown to peasants was collection of the product to the state coffers. The collected wealth was then to be distributed EQUALLY among all.
Funnily enough those in power grew fatter and richer, peasants on the other hand got to experience very little of the EQUALITY they were promised.
2006-11-09 08:49:59 · answer #3 · answered by renclrk 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You should disagree, the reason being is that not everyone was equal. Higher party members had much more influence and got many more luxuries and products.
2016-05-22 01:09:54 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
um...you lie. This deifinitely sounds like homework, and no, I'm not going to write your essay for you.
2006-11-09 08:39:03 · answer #5 · answered by she who is awesome 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋